View Full Version : Can it be put any better than this?
wvumascotdmb
09-21-2004, 03:02 PM
http://www.blackfive.net/main/images/bush_20041.jpg
Vote "W"! :thumbsup :thumbsup :thumbsup :multi
Daevian
09-21-2004, 03:04 PM
http://www.blackfive.net/main/images/bush_20041.jpg
Vote "W"! :thumbsup :thumbsup :thumbsup :multi
HA! Dude I'm voting for Kerry but that's still the shit.
mojo1210
09-21-2004, 03:11 PM
well i guess if football playing ability is what is important to you.
thing4377
09-21-2004, 03:20 PM
Kerry is probably imitating what Bush looked like when he caught that ball!!!:lol
:multi VOTE KERRY!!!!!:multi
AnyonebutBush
09-21-2004, 04:22 PM
http://www.blackfive.net/main/images/bush_20041.jpg
Vote "W"! :thumbsup :thumbsup :thumbsup :multiWow !!!! He must have learned to play football while on Vacation.
Mirgs
09-21-2004, 04:37 PM
Bush Is The Fucking Man!!!
ss10mets
09-21-2004, 04:55 PM
well i guess if football playing ability is what is important to you.
In Texas it is...
ambysshrink
09-21-2004, 05:00 PM
Bush is holding a football in one hand, and counting with the other; he has no idea what's going on. Kerry got the sun in his eyes. Who am I going to trust?
Warehouse21
09-21-2004, 06:41 PM
http://www.blackfive.net/main/images/bush_20041.jpg
Vote "W"! :thumbsup :thumbsup :thumbsup :multi
I think that picture was to show that both candidates are really not trhe sharpest. If you think that picture was set up to make Bush look good, you're really mistaken.
It's a good thing you're in a dipshit state like West Virginia that pulls no weight in the electorasl college because people like you should have no say in anything.
Warehouse21
09-21-2004, 06:41 PM
http://www.blackfive.net/main/images/bush_20041.jpg
Vote "W"! :thumbsup :thumbsup :thumbsup :multi
I think that picture was to show that both candidates are really not trhe sharpest. If you think that picture was set up to make Bush look good, you're really mistaken.
It's a good thing you're in a dipshit state like West Virginia that pulls no weight in the electorasl college because people like you should have no say in anything.
Warehouse21
09-21-2004, 06:42 PM
http://www.blackfive.net/main/images/bush_20041.jpg
Vote "W"! :thumbsup :thumbsup :thumbsup :multi
I think that picture was to show that both candidates are really not trhe sharpest. If you think that picture was set up to make Bush look good, you're really mistaken.
It's a good thing you're in a dipshit state like West Virginia that pulls no weight in the electorasl college because people like you should have no say in anything.
Warehouse21
09-21-2004, 06:42 PM
http://www.blackfive.net/main/images/bush_20041.jpg
Vote "W"! :thumbsup :thumbsup :thumbsup :multi
I think that picture was to show that both candidates are really not trhe sharpest. If you think that picture was set up to make Bush look good, you're really mistaken.
It's a good thing you're in a dipshit state like West Virginia that pulls no weight in the electorasl college because people like you should have no say in anything.
clemson357
09-21-2004, 07:37 PM
Bush is holding a football in one hand, and counting with the other; he has no idea what's going on. Kerry got the sun in his eyes. Who am I going to trust?
bush is saying, "go long"
kerry said he could catch a football but was absent from 76% of the team meetings
wvumascotdmb
09-21-2004, 08:33 PM
I think that picture was to show that both candidates are really not trhe sharpest. If you think that picture was set up to make Bush look good, you're really mistaken.
It's a good thing you're in a dipshit state like West Virginia that pulls no weight in the electorasl college because people like you should have no say in anything.
Hey mother fucker it was joke....you want to say something about my state we are all a bunch of rednecks that will kick the shit out of you! Ever seen Deliverence mother fucker!?!?! :banned
Don't ruin my thread if you can't fucking take a joke! : :violent
Spicy McHaggis
09-21-2004, 09:01 PM
I think that picture was to show that both candidates are really not trhe sharpest. If you think that picture was set up to make Bush look good, you're really mistaken.
It's a good thing you're in a dipshit state like West Virginia that pulls no weight in the electorasl college because people like you should have no say in anything.
Maybe you shouldn't insult someone's intelligence while posting the same damn message 4 times in a row!
:twak
timg1414
09-21-2004, 09:38 PM
not really hippies have a tough time with footballs jk
haildmb
09-21-2004, 10:01 PM
I think that picture was to show that both candidates are really not trhe sharpest. If you think that picture was set up to make Bush look good, you're really mistaken.
It's a good thing you're in a dipshit state like West Virginia that pulls no weight in the electorasl college because people like you should have no say in anything.
wait, say it one more time
Warehouse21
09-21-2004, 10:17 PM
sorry about the repeat post. Accidents happen.
And the reason that I separated those two thoughts in that post is because they were two different ideas. I knew he wasn't dead serious about the picture, but I don't really think people who think it's okay to send people to die for no reason should b deciding the future of the world. Didn't mean to piss on the picture. That's why I started a new paragraph.
ambysshrink
09-21-2004, 11:03 PM
bush is saying, "go long"
kerry said he could catch a football but was absent from 76% of the team meetings
No, I'm pretty sure BUsh was counting. Kerry was busy thinking about the issues, causing him to drop the football.
System
09-21-2004, 11:09 PM
I think that picture was to show that both candidates are really not trhe sharpest. If you think that picture was set up to make Bush look good, you're really mistaken.
It's a good thing you're in a dipshit state like West Virginia that pulls no weight in the electorasl college because people like you should have no say in anything.
Word of advice,
When you hear Dueling Banjos in the background, cover up your mouth, squel like a pig and pray it ends soon.
Don't mess with Rednecks, they tend to take revenge to a whole new level.
Daevian
09-21-2004, 11:36 PM
I think that picture was to show that both candidates are really not trhe sharpest. If you think that picture was set up to make Bush look good, you're really mistaken.
It's a good thing you're in a dipshit state like West Virginia that pulls no weight in the electorasl college because people like you should have no say in anything.
OH SNAP BITCH! With the Quadra post all up ons! lol
wvumascotdmb
09-21-2004, 11:41 PM
Word of advice,
When you hear Dueling Banjos in the background, cover up your mouth, squel like a pig and pray it ends soon.
Don't mess with Rednecks, they tend to take revenge to a whole new level.
:lol I love it!
wvumascotdmb
09-21-2004, 11:42 PM
Word of advice,
When you hear Dueling Banjos in the background, cover up your mouth, squel like a pig and pray it ends soon.
Don't mess with Rednecks, they tend to take revenge to a whole new level.
:lol I love it!
nonewdirections
09-21-2004, 11:44 PM
Hey mother fucker it was joke....you want to say something about my state we are all a bunch of rednecks that will kick the shit out of you! Ever seen Deliverence mother fucker!?!?!
he was being a bit of an ass and what he said was not called for, but do you really want to promote WV stereotypes? he probably has seen deliverance and that's why he has such a poor view of your state, eh?
wvumascotdmb
09-22-2004, 12:19 AM
he was being a bit of an ass and what he said was not called for, but do you really want to promote WV stereotypes? he probably has seen deliverance and that's why he has such a poor view of your state, eh?
true but i just get tired of people saying crap about good ole WV when they have never even been here! I just used the stereotypes as help to put him down! Oh well but i guess i have now seen the light shouldn't have been so vulger it just caught me in that moment ya know?
haildmb
09-22-2004, 12:22 AM
true but i just get tired of people saying crap about good ole WV when they have never even been here! I just used the stereotypes as help to put him down!
and quite a grown-up maneuver at that
ryanfitz
09-22-2004, 02:02 PM
sorry about the repeat post. Accidents happen.
And the reason that I separated those two thoughts in that post is because they were two different ideas. I knew he wasn't dead serious about the picture, but I don't really think people who think it's okay to send people to die for no reason should b deciding the future of the world. Didn't mean to piss on the picture. That's why I started a new paragraph.
Your boy voted for the war, and do you actually think he's going to pull troops out of Iraq if he's elected? Seriously.
Route_2
09-22-2004, 02:46 PM
It looks like Bush might even be considering pulling troops out.
Robert D. Novak:
Looks like U.S. troops will be leaving Iraq early next year</I>
By ROBERT D. NOVAK
INSIDE THE Bush administration policymaking apparatus, there is strong feeling that U.S. troops must leave Iraq next year. This determination is not predicated on success in implanting Iraqi democracy and internal stability. Rather, the officials are saying: Ready or not, here we go.
This prospective policy is based on Iraq’s national elections in late January, but not on ending the insurgency or reaching a national political settlement.
Getting out of Iraq would end the neo-conservative dream of building democracy in the Arab world. The U.S. would be content having saved the world from Saddam Hussein’s quest for weapons of mass destruction.
The reality of hard decisions ahead is obscured by blather on both sides in a Presidential campaign. With six weeks remaining before the election, Bush cannot be expected to admit even the possibility of a quick withdrawal.
Sen. John Kerry’s political aides, still languishing in fantastic speculation about European troops to the rescue, do not even ponder a quick exit. But Kerry supporters with foreign policy experience speculate that if elected, their candidate would take the same escape route.
Whether Bush or Kerry is elected, the President or President-elect will have to sit down immediately with the Joint Chiefs of Staff. The military will tell the election winner there are insufficient U.S. forces in Iraq to wage effective war. That leaves three realistic options: increase overall U.S. military strength to reinforce Iraq, stay with the present strength to continue the war, or get out.
Well-placed sources in the administration are confident Bush’s decision will be to get out. They believe that is the recommendation of his present national security team and would be the recommendation of second-term officials.
An informed guess might have Condoleezza Rice as secretary of state, Paul Wolfowitz as defense secretary and Stephen Hadley as national security adviser. According to my sources, all would opt for a withdrawal.
Getting out now would not end expensive U.S. reconstruction of Iraq, and certainly would not stop the fighting. Without U.S. troops, the civil war cited as the worst-case outcome by the recently leaked National Intelligence Estimate would be a reality. It would then take a resolute President to stand aside while Iraqis battle it out.
The end product would be an imperfect Iraq, probably dominated by Shia Muslims seeking revenge over long oppression by the Sunni-controlled Baathist Party. The Kurds would remain in their current semi-autonomous state.
Iraq would not be divided, reassuring neighboring countries — especially Turkey — that are apprehensive about ethnically divided nations.
This messy new Iraq is viewed by Bush officials as vastly preferable to Saddam Hussein’s police state, threatening its neighbors and the West. In private, some officials believe the mistake was not in toppling Saddam but in staying there for nation-building after the dictator was deposed. U.S. military dead then totaled slightly over 100, while now it has surpassed 1,000.
Abandonment of building democracy in Iraq would be a terrible blow to the neo-conservative dream. The Bush administration’s drift from that idea is shown in restrained reaction to Russian President Vladimir Putin’s seizure of power. While Bush officials would prefer a democratic Russia, they appreciate that Putin is determined to prevent his country from disintegrating as the Soviet Union did before it. A fragmented Russia, prey to terrorists, is not in the U.S. interest.
The Kerry campaign, realizing that its only hope is to attack Bush for his Iraq policy, is not equipped to make sober evaluations of Iraq. When I asked a Kerry political aide what his candidate would do in Iraq, he could do no better than repeat the old saw that help is on the way from European troops. Kerry’s foreign policy advisers know there will be no relief from that quarter.
In the Aug. 29 New York Times Magazine, columnist David Brooks wrote an article (“How to Reinvent the GOP”) that is regarded as a neo-con manifesto and not popular with other conservatives.
“We need to strengthen nation states,” wrote Brooks, calling for “a multilateral nation-building apparatus.”
To chastened Bush officials, that sounds like an invitation to repeat Iraq instead of making sure it never happens again.
Robert D. Novak is a Washington political columnist and a commentator on CNN.
http://www.theunionleader.com/articles_showfast.html?article=44298
vBulletin® v3.7.2, Copyright ©2000-2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.