View Full Version : NFL Football 2006-2007
Pages :
1
2
3
4
5
[
6]
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
UglyNakedGuy
10-02-2006, 03:45 PM
He'll be off the board really early. I have to imagine Quinn, Peterson, and Johnson will be considered for the first pick depending on what your team needs. If it's the Titans it'll be Johnson. The Raiders would probably draft Quinn.
I hope not. I'm a big Quinn fan and I love Johnson, I hope they go to better organizations. I hope Johnson goes somewhere with a good QB, and no Young does not fit that criteria IMO. And I hate the Raiders and their entire unclassy organization, and hope Quinn doesn't go there.
UglyNakedGuy
10-02-2006, 03:46 PM
We'll both agree that Holmes was the best reciever available. I'm still waiting on that guy to show up in Pittsburgh.
Isn't Moss hurt?
Did you agree me earlier that Jackson was the better reciever, and he was available.
thebigv
10-02-2006, 03:53 PM
God damn, I hope Quinn doesn't end up in Oakland. There'd be no hope for him on that team.
dmbmuskie
10-02-2006, 03:53 PM
I hope not. I'm a big Quinn fan and I love Johnson, I hope they go to better organizations. I hope Johnson goes somewhere with a good QB, and no Young does not fit that criteria IMO. And I hate the Raiders and their entire unclassy organization, and hope Quinn doesn't go there.
They're going to be the worst teams at the end of the year, so I have to figure they're headed there. I figure Peterson lands in Green Bay 3rd overall.
dmbmuskie
10-02-2006, 03:55 PM
Did you agree me earlier that Jackson was the better reciever, and he was available.
Not at all. Jackson didn't do much in college when compared to Holmes. Jackson's size and slightly better 40 time didn't make up for his lack of football ability in my book.
dmbmuskie
10-02-2006, 03:56 PM
With all this reciever talk, what about Justin Gatlin? Could he play in the NFL or does his track and field suspension have some effect on his NFL elgibilty. There were some whispers of him wanting to play this spring.
thebigv
10-02-2006, 04:07 PM
Maybe in Philly. They seem to love the idea of giving anyone a chance to play WR. Man do I miss Fredex.
dmbmuskie
10-02-2006, 04:10 PM
Maybe in Philly. They seem to love the idea of giving anyone a chance to play WR. Man do I miss Fredex.
I'm surprised he's not in the league somewhere. He cannot be worse than some of the guys on NFL rosters.
thebigv
10-02-2006, 04:12 PM
His attitude is absolutely atrocious. TO, Porter, and the likes can get away with it because they have sickening talent. Fredex was a big talker who had big games when they focused on McNabb and TO. But, you're right...if he's in shape he should be playing somewhere.
dmbmuskie
10-02-2006, 04:18 PM
His attitude is absolutely atrocious. TO, Porter, and the likes can get away with it because they have sickening talent. Fredex was a big talker who had big games when they focused on McNabb and TO. But, you're right...if he's in shape he should be playing somewhere.
You'd think at some point he's shut his mouth and just play football. We've probably seen the last of him.
thebigv
10-02-2006, 04:24 PM
You'd think at some point he's shut his mouth and just play football. We've probably seen the last of him.
Some people just don't like paychecks that are 100x the size of mine. Seriously, I shut my mouth when my boss is wrong, why can't they do the same and collect millions of dollars in the process?
SteelerMan
10-02-2006, 04:28 PM
If Jamarcus Russell leaves LSU after this season (a lot of people think he might), I wouldn't be surprised if he went ahead of Quinn. I'm not saying I think he's better right now, but I can see a lot of teams projecting him to be a better NFL QB than Quinn.
thebigv
10-02-2006, 04:30 PM
Huh? Based on what?
dmbmuskie
10-02-2006, 04:33 PM
I cannot see that. First, I cannot see him leaving. Second, Quinn is almost too good to be true coming into the pros. He's basically everything you could want in a franchise QB. Sure, he could flop, but he's an amazing QB prospect.
I couldn't believe they were talking the other night during the Iowa game that Troy Smith could go ahead of Quinn.
dmbmuskie
10-02-2006, 04:35 PM
Haynesworth got 5 games, which is about what I expected.
SteelerMan
10-02-2006, 04:36 PM
Huh? Based on what?
Size and arm strength. Like I said, I don't think he'll go ahead of Quinn, but I can see some teams ranking him ahead of Quinn. Remember, some teams had Cutler ahead of Leinart and Young last year.
thebigv
10-02-2006, 04:36 PM
The only QB who had a chance of going before Quinn was Tate, but he's been exposed to his true colors this year. Quinn has been mighty shaky this year, but his late game performances can NOT be taught. The same with Troy Smith, he has incredible intangibles but is too small to project himself in front of Quinn. Even if he does win a NC and Heisman. I think he has great potential as a skill position player in the NFL, just not as a QB.
UNC41
10-02-2006, 04:38 PM
I hope not. I'm a big Quinn fan and I love Johnson, I hope they go to better organizations. I hope Johnson goes somewhere with a good QB,and no Young does not fit that criteria IMO. And I hate the Raiders and their entire unclassy organization, and hope Quinn doesn't go there.
But with Young and Johnson on the same team, Tennesee would be set at WR for the next decade.
dmbmuskie
10-02-2006, 04:38 PM
What about Brohm? I say he has way too many injury concerns at this point.
Russel could get VY like hype, but he'll have to come back to school to get it. He's just becoming the clear cut starter on his own team.
dmbmuskie
10-02-2006, 04:39 PM
But with Young and Johnson on the same team, Tennesee would be set at WR for the next decade.
:lol
SteelerMan
10-02-2006, 04:42 PM
What about Brohm? I say he has way too many injury concerns at this point.
Russel could get VY like hype, but he'll have to come back to school to get it. He's just becoming the clear cut starter on his own team.
That's crazy... I was just about to mention Brohm. If he hadn't gotten injured, I think he could've been a top pick (maybe even ahead of Quinn). Now I think he'll have to come back for next season though.
thebigv
10-02-2006, 04:45 PM
What about Brohm? I say he has way too many injury concerns at this point.
Russel could get VY like hype, but he'll have to come back to school to get it. He's just becoming the clear cut starter on his own team.
I don't see Russell getting anything close to VY hype. He's got worse rushing stats than Quinn does. His size certainly will help him in the next level but Quinn has a cannon as well. Brohm will end up being a very good pick for someone when he gets himself healthy and starts carrying a rabbit's foot with him during games. I just don't see any QB coming in and being picked before Quinn at this point. Anyone who takes a QB next year is going to need him to start ASAP and he's farther along than anyone else in CFB right now.
Trippin4136
10-02-2006, 04:48 PM
Haynesworth only got 5 games? That's ridiculous. I stand by my opinion that he should have been suspended for the season.
dmbmuskie
10-02-2006, 04:52 PM
It's a huge NFL suspension. It's 1/3 of the season, and 3 games longer than any other on field suspension in NFL history.
SteelerMan
10-02-2006, 04:54 PM
I don't see Russell getting anything close to VY hype. He's got worse rushing stats than Quinn does. His size certainly will help him in the next level but Quinn has a cannon as well. Brohm will end up being a very good pick for someone when he gets himself healthy and starts carrying a rabbit's foot with him during games. I just don't see any QB coming in and being picked before Quinn at this point. Anyone who takes a QB next year is going to need him to start ASAP and he's farther along than anyone else in CFB right now.
I agree with you, but I think Russell has a stronger arm than Quinn. Since he was a freshman, he has reminded me of Daunte Culpepper... which isn't really a good thing. He has the size, the strength, and the cannon, but his decision making is pretty weak.
thebigv
10-02-2006, 05:01 PM
I agree with you, but I think Russell has a stronger arm than Quinn. Since he was a freshman, he has reminded me of Daunte Culpepper... which isn't really a good thing. He has the size, the strength, and the cannon, but his decision making is pretty weak.
:lol Poor Daunte Culpepper. He turned into a big bag of dicks real quickly, huh?
Russell probably does have a stronger arm than Quinn. Quinn has very good pocket presence and consistently bails out his OL by sidestepping diving D-Lineman. It'll be interesting to see how this pocket mobility will help him in the NFL. Quinn has also been playing since he was a freshman, and was always getting abused by Willingham's torturous playcalling. Weis has been reason #1 that he's become such a great NFL prospect. Otherwise it'd all be 'potential' instead of skill at this point.
dmbmuskie
10-02-2006, 05:18 PM
:lol Poor Daunte Culpepper. He turned into a big bag of dicks real quickly, huh?
Russell probably does have a stronger arm than Quinn. Quinn has very good pocket presence and consistently bails out his OL by sidestepping diving D-Lineman. It'll be interesting to see how this pocket mobility will help him in the NFL. Quinn has also been playing since he was a freshman, and was always getting abused by Willingham's torturous playcalling. Weis has been reason #1 that he's become such a great NFL prospect. Otherwise it'd all be 'potential' instead of skill at this point.
I think Weis has helped, but I think a lot of it is the natural maturing process. Regardless, he's a stud.
UglyNakedGuy
10-02-2006, 05:33 PM
Size and arm strength. Like I said, I don't think he'll go ahead of Quinn, but I can see some teams ranking him ahead of Quinn. Remember, some teams had Cutler ahead of Leinart and Young last year.
Russell is 6-6, 236 and Quinn is 6-4 231..
Russel only has 2 inches on him, but 6-4 is just right for a QB IMO. And Quinn is bigger for his height than Russell is for his height.
Quinn is by far the better NFL prospect.
UglyNakedGuy
10-02-2006, 05:37 PM
But with Young and Johnson on the same team, Tennesee would be set at WR for the next decade.
Sure they would under their own eyes. But IMO, Young is insanely over rated. And what I meant by what I said, is I would like Johnson to go somewhere with a QB where he could flourish. I jt don't think Young is all that. He is just hype, like Vick is. And Young was the first QB taken last year, but Cutler and Leinart will have far more successful careers IMO. I would like to see him Johnson go to SF more than I would want to see him go to TN.
UglyNakedGuy
10-02-2006, 05:40 PM
Haynesworth only got 5 games? That's ridiculous. I stand by my opinion that he should have been suspended for the season.
I agree. Odell Thurman gets suspended for a year for drinking too much, and Haynesworth gets 4 games for essentially trying to hurt someone very badly.
Chris Collinsworth said he shoulda been arrested on the field because he essentially could have killed the player if he hit his head just right or did it a bit harder, and that is scary. I think he should be suspended for the year, and if I were the other player I would seriosuly think about pressing charges against this idiot.
saygdbye4134
10-02-2006, 05:43 PM
i lost alot of respect for the NFL today.
5 games?
i think it should be one game for every stitch that guy needed.
absolute bullshit.
dmbmuskie
10-02-2006, 05:43 PM
I agree. Odell Thurman gets suspended for a year for drinking too much, and Haynesworth gets 4 games for essentially trying to hurt someone very badly.
Chris Collinsworth said he shoulda been arrested on the field because he essentially could have killed the player if he hit his head just right or did it a bit harder, and that is scary. I think he should be suspended for the year, and if I were the other player I would seriosuly think about pressing charges against this idiot.
It's a violent game. I actually think 5 games is a bit much.
I cannot see much happening to him in court.
UglyNakedGuy
10-02-2006, 06:47 PM
It's a violent game. I actually think 5 games is a bit much.
I cannot see much happening to him in court.
Yeah, cause normally guys stand over other guys and step on their face with the intent to hurt them. That's especially why no one has EVER SEEN THIS HAPPEN before. Don't give me 'it's a violent game' shit. That excuse is only valid for hard hits and whatnot, but not for this.
SteelerMan
10-02-2006, 08:02 PM
I agree. Odell Thurman gets suspended for a year for drinking too much, and Haynesworth gets 4 games for essentially trying to hurt someone very badly.
No, he didn't get suspended for "drinking too much". He was arrested for a DWI while he was already serving a four game suspension for violating the NFL's substance abuse policy. There's a difference between drinking too much and getting arrested for a DWI.
dmbmuskie
10-02-2006, 08:19 PM
Yeah, cause normally guys stand over other guys and step on their face with the intent to hurt them. That's especially why no one has EVER SEEN THIS HAPPEN before. Don't give me 'it's a violent game' shit. That excuse is only valid for hard hits and whatnot, but not for this.
This isn't like when Bertuzzi hammered the guy with his stick. It's not even as bad as a pitcher trying to hit someone with a 90 mph fastball. I don't get why everyone wants to hang this guy.
UglyNakedGuy
10-02-2006, 09:04 PM
This isn't like when Bertuzzi hammered the guy with his stick. It's not even as bad as a pitcher trying to hit someone with a 90 mph fastball. I don't get why everyone wants to hang this guy.
He viciously tried to hurt him not once but TWICE. And yeah you can compare it to a pitcher beaning someone in the back...My God. :rolleyes:rolleyes
dmbmuskie
10-02-2006, 09:11 PM
He viciously tried to hurt him not once but TWICE. And yeah you can compare it to a pitcher beaning someone in the back...My God. :rolleyes:rolleyes
You viciously try to hurt someone every play. Sure, this was uncalled for, but I've seen much worse happen on the football field, legal and illegal. Have you ever seen the highlight of Terry Bradshaw getting his neck broke? What about McMahon getting slammed in 1986. Warren Sapp laying out Chad Clifton. I could go on and on. I just do not get why we get all out of shape when something like this happens.
Trippin4136
10-02-2006, 09:27 PM
This isn't like when Bertuzzi hammered the guy with his stick. It's not even as bad as a pitcher trying to hit someone with a 90 mph fastball. I don't get why everyone wants to hang this guy.
Actually I think it is a good comparison. Bertuzzi used his stick as a weapon. Haynesworth used his spikes as a weapon. These aren't your little brother's soccer cleats they're out there playing with. These spikes are 1/2 inches pieces of metal that will tear through flesh when used in that fashion.
It wasn't a hard or nasty play in the flow of the game. It was a thought out maneuver after played had ended. Did it more than double the largest suspension bases on something on the field, yes? But this isn't exactly hitting a guy below the knee or hitting a QB too high.
If someone did this to another individual on the street, it would be assault. But since it's between the lines, its "part of the game". Bull. Haynesworth should be gone for the season.
dmbmuskie
10-02-2006, 09:30 PM
I'm not going to win the argument about this not being that bad, so I'm going to stop.
Trippin4136
10-02-2006, 09:31 PM
not arguing man, just sharing opinions.
dmbmuskie
10-02-2006, 09:34 PM
I know. I'm not saying I condone kicking someone in the face or anything like that. I think what he did was wrong and he needed to be punished. I think it has just got to the point where stuff doesn't surprise me anymore.
UglyNakedGuy
10-02-2006, 09:41 PM
Actually I think it is a good comparison. Bertuzzi used his stick as a weapon. Haynesworth used his spikes as a weapon. These aren't your little brother's soccer cleats they're out there playing with. These spikes are 1/2 inches pieces of metal that will tear through flesh when used in that fashion.
It wasn't a hard or nasty play in the flow of the game. It was a thought out maneuver after played had ended. Did it more than double the largest suspension bases on something on the field, yes? But this isn't exactly hitting a guy below the knee or hitting a QB too high.
If someone did this to another individual on the street, it would be assault. But since it's between the lines, its "part of the game". Bull. Haynesworth should be gone for the season.
:thumbsup For once, we agree. :lol
UNC41
10-02-2006, 09:54 PM
Sure they would under their own eyes. But IMO, Young is insanely over rated. And what I meant by what I said, is I would like Johnson to go somewhere with a QB where he could flourish. I jt don't think Young is all that. He is just hype, like Vick is. And Young was the first QB taken last year, but Cutler and Leinart will have far more successful careers IMO. I would like to see him Johnson go to SF more than I would want to see him go to TN.
You totally missed me agreeing with you and also missed the punchline of Young being a better WR than he will QB.
UglyNakedGuy
10-02-2006, 10:42 PM
You totally missed me agreeing with you and also missed the punchline of Young being a better WR than he will QB.
Ok..
thebigv
10-02-2006, 10:52 PM
also missed the punchline of Young being a better WR than he will QB.
Ahh!! Haha, I get it now. :BANG I'm retarded.
Tiduwho
10-02-2006, 11:02 PM
Favre still inching closer to Blanda...
Tiduwho
10-02-2006, 11:05 PM
Well, the Packers had a good 2 and a half quarters.
Tiduwho
10-02-2006, 11:14 PM
This is getting painful to watch. Poor Brett.
collinsat12
10-02-2006, 11:16 PM
If only Favre was as good as Brad Johnson...
dmbmuskie
10-02-2006, 11:17 PM
If I were Favre I'd demand a trade to Tampa tommorrow morning.
Trippin4136
10-03-2006, 09:12 AM
If I were Favre I'd demand a trade to Tampa tommorrow morning.
Why? You saw what happened to Simms behind that line.
thebigv
10-03-2006, 09:26 AM
Imagine the beauty of having Favre throw into triple coverage down by 3 touchdowns in TAMPA! The weather is much better on an old man's joints.
Tiduwho
10-03-2006, 12:50 PM
Philly was my sub for Atlanta if they beat GB last night, so looks like I win.
ESPN
1. Bearss
2. Colts
3. Ravens
4. Eagles
5. Pats
UglyNakedGuy
10-03-2006, 01:01 PM
Philly was my sub for Atlanta if they beat GB last night, so looks like I win.
ESPN
1. Bearss
2. Colts
3. Ravens
4. Eagles
5. Pats
That's the most accurate top 5 I have seen in this thread. Everyone elses seems to be completely ridiculous.
I wouldn't put them in that order though. The only one in order I agree with is the Bears.
Tiduwho
10-03-2006, 05:07 PM
That's the most accurate top 5 I have seen in this thread. Everyone elses seems to be completely ridiculous.
I wouldn't put them in that order though. The only one in order I agree with is the Bears.
:multi
Tiduwho
10-04-2006, 12:54 AM
The more I see Keyshawn give Deshaun Foster that forearm shiver to the back of the neck, the funnier it becomes. It's even better that he finished him off with a push with his other hand. :lol
xBigNastyx
10-04-2006, 01:07 AM
The more I see Keyshawn give Deshaun Foster that forearm shiver to the back of the neck, the funnier it becomes. It's even better that he finished him off with a push with his other hand. :lol
Oh I saw that, it was pretty funny!
xBigNastyx
10-04-2006, 01:09 AM
Since everyone is making their top 5 picks, I'll do mine
1. Bears
2. Patriots :D
3. Colts
4. Ravens
5. Eagles
I hope I'm not forgetting someone.
I expect The Steelers and Carolina to be on this list later on this season.
dmbmuskie
10-04-2006, 12:08 PM
Since everyone is making their top 5 picks, I'll do mine
1. Bears
2. Patriots :D
3. Colts
4. Ravens
5. Eagles
I hope I'm not forgetting someone.
I expect The Steelers and Carolina to be on this list later on this season.
Yeah at the end of the year I'd expect it to look like this.
1. Colts 13-3
2. Bears 14-2
3. Patriots 12-4
4. Panthers 12-4
5. Steelers 11-5
Trippin4136
10-04-2006, 12:11 PM
The more I see Keyshawn give Deshaun Foster that forearm shiver to the back of the neck, the funnier it becomes. It's even better that he finished him off with a push with his other hand. :lol
They had a great yuckfest on NFL Live about it last night. I hadn't seen that highlight until then, but it was hilarious. Nothing like getting blasted by your teammate after scoring.
41ravens
10-04-2006, 04:35 PM
amen, scoop. amen.
http://sports.espn.go.com/espn/page2/story?page=jackson/061003&lpos=spotlight&lid=tab4pos2
xBigNastyx
10-04-2006, 04:39 PM
Yeah at the end of the year I'd expect it to look like this.
1. Colts 13-3
2. Bears 14-2
3. Patriots 12-4
4. Panthers 12-4
5. Steelers 11-5
I agree about the list, and the order for the most part. But I don't think the Colts are the best team in the NFL, and I don't think they will be at any point this year. However, I guess by the end of the year, the Colts, Bears, and Pats could be interchangable in the 3 best teams. Meaning as long as they are ranked as the top 3, it doesn't matter what order they are in. Does that make sense?
SteelerMan
10-04-2006, 05:00 PM
I swear... every week, it's like there's a new overrated team that everyone is jumping all over. Last week it was the Bengals, this week it's the Patriots. This is the main reason I don't pay attention to "power rankings" or listen to analysts... they can do a complete 180 from one week to the next, and it's deemed acceptable. Last week, the Bengals "had matured" and were "Super Bowl contenders"... this week, they apparently "had everybody fooled" and "don't look good at all". People also have VERY short memories when rating teams. I mean, the Patriots are the 2nd best team in the league??? Has everyone forgotten about how they barely squeaked past Buffalo, or how horrible Denver made them look?
xBigNastyx
10-04-2006, 05:04 PM
I swear... every week, it's like there's a new overrated team that everyone is jumping all over. Last week it was the Bengals, this week it's the Patriots. This is the main reason I don't pay attention to "power rankings" or listen to analysts... they can do a complete 180 from one week to the next, and it's deemed acceptable. Last week, the Bengals "had matured" and were "Super Bowl contenders"... this week, they apparently "had everybody fooled" and "don't look good at all". People also have VERY short memories when rating teams. I mean, the Patriots are the 2nd best team in the league??? Has everyone forgotten about how they barely squeaked past Buffalo, or how horrible Denver made them look?
Those were early games though. Things begin to get sorted out now. The Patriots are a top 3 team, and if they don't struggle against Miami, then not many will be able to argue. I agree with Muskie that the top 5 teams at the end of the year will be Bears, Colts, Patriots, Steelers, Panthers.
And the funny thing is, those are the 5 teams I expected to be in the top 5 before the year even started.
And I disagree with your idea of the most over rated team. I think the Falcons are the most over rated.
SteelerMan
10-04-2006, 05:33 PM
Those were early games though. Things begin to get sorted out now. The Patriots are a top 3 team, and if they don't struggle against Miami, then not many will be able to argue. I agree with Muskie that the top 5 teams at the end of the year will be Bears, Colts, Patriots, Steelers, Panthers.
And the funny thing is, those are the 5 teams I expected to be in the top 5 before the year even started.
And I disagree with your idea of the most over rated team. I think the Falcons are the most over rated.
"Early games"? :lol The Broncos game was 10 days ago! And beating the Dolphins will prove that the Patriots are a Top 3 team? How is that? I didn't say the Patriots were the "most overrated"... I just think people are, as usual, overemphasizing the meaning of one game. I'd agree with you that the Falcons are more overrated than the Patriots.
xBigNastyx
10-04-2006, 05:39 PM
"Early games"? :lol The Broncos game was 10 days ago! And beating the Dolphins will prove that the Patriots are a Top 3 team? How is that? I didn't say the Patriots were the "most overrated"... I just think people are, as usual, overemphasizing the meaning of one game. I'd agree with you that the Falcons are more overrated than the Patriots.
Yeah it was an early game. Week 3 is considered early in the season to me, not sure about you. The Pats found themselves against the Bengals IMO, and you should expect them to keep playing well. Their games against Buffalo, second half agaisnt NYJ, and Denver didn't represent their team completely IMO. And if they play the way they did last week and crush the Dolphins, YES it will insert them as a legit top 3 team. They are already in the top 5.
SteelerMan
10-04-2006, 05:51 PM
Yeah it was an early game. Week 3 is considered early in the season to me, not sure about you. The Pats found themselves against the Bengals IMO, and you should expect them to keep playing well. Their games against Buffalo, second half agaisnt NYJ, and Denver didn't represent their team completely IMO. And if they play the way they did last week and crush the Dolphins, YES it will insert them as a legit top 3 team. They are already in the top 5.
Your logic is so flawed that I don't feel like taking the time to argue with it.
xBigNastyx
10-04-2006, 05:53 PM
Your logic is so flawed that I don't feel like taking the time to argue with it.
Yeah my OPINION must be wrong.
xBigNastyx
10-04-2006, 05:56 PM
Your logic is so flawed that I don't feel like taking the time to argue with it.
Then please stop trying to tell me that my opinion is wrong and flawed. Opinions are just that, opinions, and I respect yours, so try to respect mine. IMO, the Pats are a top 3 team. If you disagree, you disagree, there is no right or wrong, just try not to be such a dick about it man.
Anywho, how do you think Pittsburgh will do against SD, and do you think Ben will play well for a change?
SteelerMan
10-04-2006, 06:01 PM
Yeah my OPINION must be wrong.
:lol
I never said you were "wrong"... I said your logic was flawed. Week 3 is less meaningful than Week 4 because it was "an early game"? Beating a last place 1-3 team proves you're a Top 3 team? We should judge a team based only on their most recent game? In that case, I guess Charlie Frye is the new Joe Montana and the Browns are marching toward the playoffs.
SteelerMan
10-04-2006, 06:02 PM
Then please stop trying to tell me that my opinion is wrong and flawed. Opinions are just that, opinions, and I respect yours, so try to respect mine. IMO, the Pats are a top 3 team. If you disagree, you disagree, there is no right or wrong, just try not to be such a dick about it man.
Anywho, how do you think Pittsburgh will do against SD, and do you think Ben will play well for a change?
Again, I never said your opinion was wrong... your support for your opinion didn't make any sense, and that's what I was pointing out. If you think the Patriots are a Top 5 team, that's fine. But your reasons just weren't very good ones.
xBigNastyx
10-04-2006, 06:02 PM
Again, I never said your opinion was wrong... your support for your opinion didn't make any sense, and that's what I was pointing out. If you think the Patriots are a Top 5 team, that's fine. But your reasons just weren't very good ones.
Well, that I could understand, I had trouble putting my thoughts into words there, so maybe it didn't make much sense.
xBigNastyx
10-04-2006, 06:03 PM
:lol
I never said you were "wrong"... I said your logic was flawed. Week 3 is less meaningful than Week 4 because it was "an early game"? Beating a last place 1-3 team proves you're a Top 3 team? We should judge a team based only on their most recent game? In that case, I guess Charlie Frye is the new Joe Montana and the Browns are marching toward the playoffs.
And this was not my logic, and this is nothing close to what I said. I guess I just didn't make my opinion clear so nevermind.
RJ2kWJ
10-04-2006, 06:25 PM
I wonder if the superchargers are comin out in the powder blue's this weekend? My favorite uni's in the league by far.
I am amped for the NFC East games this weekend. Huge game for my Skins and a huge game for the T.O. return to Philly. Who the HELL do I root for in that game? :lol
lmaciolek
10-04-2006, 06:27 PM
I wonder if the superchargers are comin out in the powder blue's this weekend? My favorite jerseys in the league by far.
I am amped for the NFC East games this weekend. Huge game for my Skins and a huge game for the T.O. return to Philly. Who the HELL do I root for in that game? :lol
Just as long as they beat the Squeelers!
SteelerMan
10-04-2006, 06:54 PM
And this was not my logic, and this is nothing close to what I said. I guess I just didn't make my opinion clear so nevermind.
Eh, don't worry about it. It's cool. To answer your question, I'm not too confident about the Steelers beating the Chargers. Merriman and the Chargers pass rush is scary, and with Ben already not playing well, it could be a long evening for him. I think our defense could end up being the difference though. Rivers played reasonably well against the Ravens D (which is comparable to the Steelers, although I still think we're better), but given the fact that this is still only his 4th game as a starter, I think Dick Lebeau is going to do everything he can to confuse him and force him to commit one or two costly turnovers. I expect it to be a very close game with one team winning by a field goal.
xBigNastyx
10-04-2006, 07:03 PM
Eh, don't worry about it. It's cool. To answer your question, I'm not too confident about the Steelers beating the Chargers. Merriman and the Chargers pass rush is scary, and with Ben already not playing well, it could be a long evening for him. I think our defense could end up being the difference though. Rivers played reasonably well against the Ravens D (which is comparable to the Steelers, although I still think we're better), but given the fact that this is still only his 4th game as a starter, I think Dick Lebeau is going to do everything he can to confuse him and force him to commit one or two costly turnovers. I expect it to be a very close game with one team winning by a field goal.
I agree with most of what you said, but the Pittsburgh D better than Baltimore D? I dono about that! Pittsburgh D is fantastic, but Chicago and Baltimore are on their own level IMO.
dmbmuskie
10-05-2006, 12:19 AM
Eh, don't worry about it. It's cool. To answer your question, I'm not too confident about the Steelers beating the Chargers. Merriman and the Chargers pass rush is scary, and with Ben already not playing well, it could be a long evening for him. I think our defense could end up being the difference though. Rivers played reasonably well against the Ravens D (which is comparable to the Steelers, although I still think we're better), but given the fact that this is still only his 4th game as a starter, I think Dick Lebeau is going to do everything he can to confuse him and force him to commit one or two costly turnovers. I expect it to be a very close game with one team winning by a field goal.
We almost played this same game last year. Prime Time in San Diego following up a game where we beat ourselves and Ben played bad. Obviously Ben played worse and we made more mistakes against Cincy this year than New England last year, but it's still a very similar feel to the game.
I think we win because we have to. 1-3 is a whole world away from 2-2. I also think we win because Phillip Rivers head is going to be spinning with all the shit he is going to see.
dmbmuskie
10-05-2006, 12:43 AM
I agree with most of what you said, but the Pittsburgh D better than Baltimore D? I dono about that! Pittsburgh D is fantastic, but Chicago and Baltimore are on their own level IMO.
I know I'm partial to the Steelers, but I think they're the best.
The Ravens live on reputation. They're far removed from their Super Bowl team.
I don't see how anyone can rank the Bears number 1 after the playoffs last year where they got destroyed.
I'll break it down a little furter.
D-Line
1. Steelers- Casey Hampton is the best at his position. Aaron Smith only trails Richard Seymour as a 3-4 end. Keisel provides a down lineman rush like they haven't had in a while.
2. Bear - It's real close here. Tommy Harris could push them over the top by the end of the year.
3. Ravens - Suggs and Gregg are undersized. Ngata hasn't proven anything. Pryce is getting some miles on him at this point.
Linebackers.
1. Steelers - Porter, Farrior, and Haggans could all make the Pro-Bowl, and Foote is the leading tackler on the team.
2. Bears - Urlacher and Briggs are better than Lewis and Scott.
3. Ravens - See above.
Secondary.
1. Ravens - The most talented secondary in the league, maybe ever. How the hell do they have an undrafted FA rookie playing safety.
2. Steelers - Polamalu is the most versatile defender in the league, and probably the best safety. Ike Taylor is an emerging star, just ask Chad Johnson. Townsend is like a coach on the field. The jury is still out on Ryan Clark. McFadden might be the best nickle back in football.
3. The safety situation is unsettled. The corners are young. Brown is good, but not in the caliber of Reed or Polamalu.
These are just opinions, and I hope I don't start a firefight.
xBigNastyx
10-05-2006, 12:52 AM
Very well thought out and great read man. Appreciate it. And now that you put it that way, I think I almost agree with you as far as defense in "real life". People's opinions (I admit this as well) get skewed on defenses frmo fantasy, because defenses that are fantastic in real life, and a good example is Jacksonville. They are great, but don't get much fantasy points, so some might not think as highly as them. And Baltimore and Chicago get by far the most points, so it's easy to assume they are the best. Know what I mean? But when you put it that way, it's interesting to think about. :thumbsup
dmbmuskie
10-05-2006, 01:01 AM
Very well thought out and great read man. Appreciate it. And now that you put it that way, I think I almost agree with you as far as defense in "real life". People's opinions (I admit this as well) get skewed on defenses frmo fantasy, because defenses that are fantastic in real life, and a good example is Jacksonville. They are great, but don't get much fantasy points, so some might not think as highly as them. And Baltimore and Chicago get by far the most points, so it's easy to assume they are the best. Know what I mean? But when you put it that way, it's interesting to think about. :thumbsup
Fantasy football is ruining logical thinking about football. It makes the game about stats rather than stats in the context of the game.
xBigNastyx
10-05-2006, 01:05 AM
Fantasy football is ruining logical thinking about football. It makes the game about stats rather than stats in the context of the game.
I agree. I try to keep a fair balance.
For example, Jeff Wilkins is rated as the best kicker currently in fantasy, and he wouldn't even be in my top 5 if I had to tell you the 5 best kickers. You have to take that stuff with a grain of salt IMO.
Again, thanks for the read, and feel free to elaborate on other things as well in that manner. :thumbsup
dmbmuskie
10-05-2006, 01:05 AM
Who's your team man?
xBigNastyx
10-05-2006, 01:07 AM
Who's your team man?
Patriots. I hope we meet with you guys in the playoffs this year, NE/Pittsburgh games are always GREAT games to watch!
dmbmuskie
10-05-2006, 01:11 AM
Patriots. I hope we meet with you guys in the playoffs this year, NE/Pittsburgh games are always GREAT games to watch!
Yeah, I hate the Pats whenever we play them. I still cannot Randle El lateralled that damn ball last year.
The Pats defense is nothing to laugh at. You guys have the best DL in football.
xBigNastyx
10-05-2006, 01:15 AM
Yeah, I hate the Pats whenever we play them. I still cannot Randle El lateralled that damn ball last year.
The Pats defense is nothing to laugh at. You guys have the best DL in football.
Yeah they are playing pretty well this year so far. We opened up last week against Cincy in a 4-2 which was interesting, with Poteat at nickle.
dmbmuskie
10-05-2006, 01:18 AM
Yeah they are playing pretty well this year so far. We opened up last week against Cincy in a 4-2 which was interesting, with Poteat at nickle.
Was it a real 4-2 or was it a 2-4 with Colvin playing down? I didn't really start paying attention to the game until the 2nd half for some reason.
thebigv
10-05-2006, 10:02 AM
These are just opinions, and I hope I don't start a firefight.
By omitting the Browns, I'll assume you meant to put them at the 4 spot in all those rankings. :D
dmbmuskie
10-06-2006, 12:05 AM
By omitting the Browns, I'll assume you meant to put them at the 4 spot in all those rankings. :D
:thumbsup Yes, the Browns are in the 4 spot in all catagories.
:lol In the AFC North.
thebigv
10-06-2006, 09:55 AM
Charlie Frye is tied for the most touchdowns in the AFC. ;)
Tiduwho
10-08-2006, 01:02 PM
The Bears have held their last 9 opponents at Soldier Field under 10 points. Today will be no different methinks. It's my birthday! If they lost I might just have to drink myself into a hole...
You know, Bellicheck gets alot of free passes for his defensive brilliance, but now for the fourth or fifth time this year he's called a run on a third and long in the red zone and, predictably, had to settle for a field goal. Nothing pisses me off more than a 5 yard playcall in the redzone when you need 8 yards, and it's turning into a pattern of at least once a game.
xBigNastyx
10-08-2006, 01:54 PM
You know, Bellicheck gets alot of free passes for his defensive brilliance, but now for the fourth or fifth time this year he's called a run on a third and long in the red zone and, predictably, had to settle for a field goal. Nothing pisses me off more than a 5 yard playcall in the redzone when you need 8 yards, and it's turning into a pattern of at least once a game.
Belichick.
Tiduwho
10-08-2006, 02:02 PM
Still 8 minutes left in the 2nd quarter, and this game is over. The Bills defense? Lol @ anyone that said they were good. The Bears have scored on every possession and are running AT WILL. Both Jones and Benson are getting like 6 yards a carry.
What a good b-day present.
AFurth
10-08-2006, 02:09 PM
Still 8 minutes left in the 2nd quarter, and this game is over. The Bills defense? Lol @ anyone that said they were good. The Bears have scored on every possession and are running AT WILL. Both Jones and Benson are getting like 6 yards a carry.
What a good b-day present.
happy birthday.
bear down chicago bears.
Tiduwho
10-08-2006, 02:16 PM
happy birthday.
bear down chicago bears.
Thanks man, 21! Last night was great.
This is even better. ANOTHER TD. I have NEVER in my life seen a QB like this in a Bears uniform. He can thread the needle through 3 guys like Brett Favre (not that I'm THAT guy, just saying he can thread the needle). Unbelievable.
What did I tell you guys? SEX-Y REX-Y!!!!
AFurth
10-08-2006, 02:17 PM
Thanks man, 21! Last night was great.
This is even better. ANOTHER TD. I have NEVER in my life seen a QB like this in a Bears uniform. He can thread the needle through 3 guys like Brett Favre (not that I'm THAT guy, just saying he can thread the needle). Unbelievable.
What did I tell you guys? SEX-Y REX-Y!!!!
i picked him up for fantasy in week 2. i started him for the first time this week.
i look like a genius :).
WOW - as I type this 27-0.
domination.
What the flying fuck playcall was that? Fuck off Belicheck. Fuck off long, and fuck off hard. Jesus fucking christ that was pathetic. Become a defensive coordinator and throw the fucking offensive book away.
Tiduwho
10-08-2006, 02:22 PM
What the flying fuck playcall was that? Fuck off Belicheck. Fuck off long, and fuck off hard. Jesus fucking christ that was pathetic. Become a defensive coordinator and throw the fucking offensive book away.
I've been waiting for Pats fans to turn on Belichek for three years. I can't tell you how much joy I take in reading that post of yours.
I can't wait for week 12. Gonna be a great game. :hug
No, it's not. The Pats will be on full autopilot at that point since the AFC East sucks ass. I fully expect the Bears to destroy them.
xBigNastyx
10-08-2006, 02:30 PM
What the flying fuck playcall was that? Fuck off Belicheck. Fuck off long, and fuck off hard. Jesus fucking christ that was pathetic. Become a defensive coordinator and throw the fucking offensive book away.
Oh shutup.
And learn how to spell his name.
Go fuck yourself. All you can "contribute" is a spell-check on one name? Eat shit. Contribute something worthwhile. It's fucks like you that make it impossible to have any type of sports discussion.
dre2142
10-08-2006, 02:45 PM
Ive been playing Rex since the beginning.....in place of Big Ben. Everyone thought I was crazy.....
Wow. Has Saban ever done anything right with that flag?
AFurth
10-08-2006, 03:13 PM
Ive been playing Rex since the beginning.....in place of Big Ben. Everyone thought I was crazy.....
I picked him up after reading his stats from the detroit and green bay games.
I've been waiting for a letdown, but after watching him perservere against the vikes and be a winner and systematically destroy the seahawks, i knew i needed to start him.
AFurth
10-08-2006, 03:26 PM
only problem with grossman
he only plays 3 quarters - game's over by then haha
xBigNastyx
10-08-2006, 03:36 PM
Go fuck yourself. All you can "contribute" is a spell-check on one name? Eat shit. Contribute something worthwhile. It's fucks like you that make it impossible to have any type of sports discussion.
You think you have inteligent discussions? All you do is complain and freak out and call every player and coach a fucking idiot, and curse and make yourself look like a fool. If you want have to start an inteligent discussion, then do just that, act like you are inteligent. When you just go "fuck you BELICHICK! You are an awful coach blah blah, Nick Saban you are an idiot" it's not gonna get anywhere man.
Right. I never have an intelligent discussion. Ever. I think I should go sulk and shutup as you say. Obviously, you have power over me and know far more about everything in the world than I ever will. How will I ever live with myself?
cwsrule88
10-08-2006, 03:57 PM
Bears 40, bills 7
bears 5-0 :bounce
Tiduwho
10-08-2006, 04:17 PM
Omg, heartbreak central for Packer fans. Oh wow....oh man. That is so horrible.
xBigNastyx
10-08-2006, 04:51 PM
Right. I never have an intelligent discussion. Ever. I think I should go sulk and shutup as you say. Obviously, you have power over me and know far more about everything in the world than I ever will. How will I ever live with myself?
I suppose exagerating is fun huh? Dude chill out.
How bout Leinart? Man he is off to a great start. Knock on wood.
I shoulda listened to my gut and played him and not played Delhomme since Palmer is on Bye. But I let people talk me out of it. :violent
Trippin4136
10-08-2006, 04:56 PM
It's amazing every week the point differential between the Bears and their opponent. With this combo, they continue to distance themselves from the rest of the league. So far.
Tiduwho
10-08-2006, 05:56 PM
Bears 156
Opponents 36
120 point differential. That's kinda good.
Trippin4136
10-08-2006, 06:04 PM
Bears 156
Opponents 36
120 point differential. That's kinda good.
I hadn't looked at the exact numbers but from what I remember of the scores of their last 3 games, that sounds about right. I mean 31-7 average score? Wow.
They should either cancel the rest of the NFL season or declare the Super Bowl a race for 2nd place. The Bears are on another level right now.
luke7
10-08-2006, 07:47 PM
As much as people on here hate on McNabb, he is the MVP so far this year.
Bledsoe is so washed. My Dolphins suck.
BotheDMBFan
10-08-2006, 08:04 PM
You think you have inteligent discussions? All you do is complain and freak out and call every player and coach a fucking idiot, and curse and make yourself look like a fool. If you want have to start an inteligent discussion, then do just that, act like you are inteligent. When you just go "fuck you BELICHICK! You are an awful coach blah blah, Nick Saban you are an idiot" it's not gonna get anywhere man.
Fuck off Bignasty.
Rob>You, fact of life.
seekupig
10-08-2006, 09:52 PM
i'm glad Larry Johnson is still alive..... that was a nasty facemask he took. hope he's ok....
JamesM
10-08-2006, 10:12 PM
what do san diego people watch tonight?
luke7
10-08-2006, 11:19 PM
The Steelers are beginning to look more and more like one of those Super Bowl Champions that fail to even make the playoffs the following year.
SteelerMan
10-09-2006, 12:34 AM
The Steelers are beginning to look more and more like one of those Super Bowl Champions that fail to even make the playoffs the following year.
You've got that right. The offense has been struggling, but with the way the defense played in the second half tonight, we don't deserve to make it. They're playing the most uninspired football I've EVER seen a Bill Cowher coached team play. He better light a fire under their asses before the next game, or our season will soon be over.
xBigNastyx
10-09-2006, 12:49 AM
Fuck off Bignasty.
Rob>You, fact of life.
Dude shutup. Don't try to butt into a conversation you had no a part of. Try to grow up a little bit man and stop looking to just flat out argue.
BotheDMBFan
10-09-2006, 01:16 AM
Do you know me?
Do you know what I do?
No, and no.
So do be quiet.
DMBfan41
10-09-2006, 01:17 AM
nice win by the G-Unit today.
Defense showed up for the first time this season. Offense had some nice drives. Feely won the game with 4 field goals.
Happy in Giants land tonight
BotheDMBFan
10-09-2006, 01:18 AM
Thing is, your team plays great one week, then plays like shit the next.
New England manages to prove every year that against the Dolphins, it's better to be lucky than good. They also proved how important Graham is to the offense.
Tom Brady proved yesterday that there's something wrong with him. He's developed a tell as to where and when he'll be throwing (batted balls), he's consistantly missing receivers on correct routes (the "lack of familiarity" excuse no longer holds water), and his pocket awareness is slipping.
The defense still is capable of giving up the big play and disappear for minutes at a time. If yesterday had been against the Jets, Pennington's short passing game would have utterly shattered the Pats. Joey Harrington, Wes Welker, and Randy McMicheal picked this team apart. I look at those typed words and blood shoots out of my nose. Had it not been for a bad INT and a tipped ball INT, Miami very likely walks out with a victory. Yikes.
Apparently, nobody got the memo to Belichick (happy, douchebag?) that 2nd and 9 isn't a good place to be, seeing as how many times he threw Malroney or Dillon at the center of the Dolphins defense to be stuffed. I'm sure the Pats have two very sore RBs this morning.
Let us give thanks for the bye week and hope some collective heads get pulled out of some collective asses. It'll be easy to cruise to the AFC East title, but this team has some serious flaws right now that the Colts and Bears are going to exploit to the tune of blowouts.
lmaciolek
10-09-2006, 08:39 AM
I know I'm partial to the Steelers, but I think they're the best.
The Ravens live on reputation. They're far removed from their Super Bowl team.
I don't see how anyone can rank the Bears number 1 after the playoffs last year where they got destroyed.
I'll break it down a little furter.
I will have to disagree with your opinions. Its obvious you rank the Steelers ahead because they are your team, I can understand that.
But to discredit the Bears because of what happened to them last year is not a good argument.
The Ravens play a different style of D than the Steelers, more of a bend but don't break. They figure that the more an Offense has to snap the ball to move down field, the better opportunity they have to make a mistake. The Ravens are one of the most dangerous Defenses because of that point.
The LBs? If you call the Ravens 3 the worst, its by a slim margin. Like the Steelers, we have 3 LBs that can be Pro Bowlers as well. Bart Scot was Defensive POM last month and he started off this month with an INT and 14 tackles against the Chargers. Adalius Thomas can play any position on the Defense and is very valuable to the team, any where you put him. As far as Gregg being undersized, that doesn't matter. He gets penetration and was effective, even when they ran a 3-4 and he was the only tackle. Ngata hasn't done anything yet? What exactly do you want your tackles to do? Get in the back field and disrupt the running game. He has done that. I am not sure what you want from him, maybe to get to the QB before he hands off the ball?
The Secondary is very good, and they don't have an undrafted rookie playing, he actually was drafted in the 5th round and was a stand out at GT. They only need a hard hitting guy in our safety position, they have the coverage down.
I would say that all 3 defenses right now are the top 3 in the NFL. To put one ahead of another shows too much bias in my opinion. If I did have to rank them it would be:
Bears
Ravens
Steelers
But they could be interchangeable and it wouldn't matter too much.
Why are we even talking about the Steelers anymore?
SteelerMan
10-09-2006, 09:19 AM
Why are we even talking about the Steelers anymore?
Well, we're talking about the best defenses in the NFL, so the Steelers are pretty relevant if you ask me (although they didn't play like it in the 2nd half last night).
lmaciolek
10-09-2006, 09:34 AM
Why are we even talking about the Steelers anymore?
Because this is the NFL thread, and they are in the NFL.
Talk about the Bucs for all I care.
Well, can we talk about the Raiders getting destroyed by the mighty 49ers? I can't wait to see a team go winless all season and make fun of Art Shell for years to come!
SteelerMan
10-09-2006, 10:21 AM
Well, can we talk about the Raiders getting destroyed by the mighty 49ers? I can't wait to see a team go winless all season and make fun of Art Shell for years to come!
Absolutely. One of my dreams is to see a team go 0-16. I'm looking at their schedule, and now that the Browns and 49ers are out of the way, the only game left that really scares me is the December 3rd matchup against the Texans. The Texans have been playing much better this season though (fun fact: David Carr is the highest rated passer in the NFL), so this could be the year my dream comes true!
lmaciolek
10-09-2006, 12:03 PM
Absolutely. One of my dreams is to see a team go 0-16. I'm looking at their schedule, and now that the Browns and 49ers are out of the way, the only game left that really scares me is the December 3rd matchup against the Texans. The Texans have been playing much better this season though (fun fact: David Carr is the highest rated passer in the NFL), so this could be the year my dream comes true!
:lol
I don't think I have ever in my life seen that sentance formed... :)
dmbmuskie
10-09-2006, 12:52 PM
Why are we even talking about the Steelers anymore?
Because it's fun to bash the defending Super Bowl champs when they suck.
I never thought Steelers vs Raiders could decide who gets the number 1 pick in next years draft.
SteelerMan
10-09-2006, 01:01 PM
I never thought Steelers vs Raiders could decide who gets the number 1 pick in next years draft.
:lol
Okay, we're not that bad. We've had a brutal schedule... our opponents' thus far have a 10-8 record (the three losses were to teams with a combined 9-4 record). On the other hand, the Ravens 4-0 record is against teams with a 4-13 record. Yes, they're winning the games they need to win, but people seem to ignore their schedule when discussing how great they are this season. Swap those schedules, and I say we're 3-1. Unfortunately, things aren't going to get much easier the rest of the way... very few cupcakes on our schedule.
dmbmuskie
10-09-2006, 01:05 PM
:lol
Okay, we're not that bad. We've had a brutal schedule... our opponents' thus far have a 10-8 record (the three losses were to teams with a combined 9-4 record). On the other hand, the Ravens 4-0 record is against teams with a 4-13 record. Yes, they're winning the games they need to win, but people seem to ignore their schedule when discussing how great they are this season. Swap those schedules, and I say we're 3-1. Unfortunately, things aren't going to get much easier the rest of the way... very few cupcakes on our schedule.
You know you want to see Calvin Johnson in Pittsburgh.
lmaciolek
10-09-2006, 01:09 PM
:lol
Okay, we're not that bad. We've had a brutal schedule... our opponents' thus far have a 10-8 record (the three losses were to teams with a combined 9-4 record). On the other hand, the Ravens 4-0 record is against teams with a 4-13 record. Yes, they're winning the games they need to win, but people seem to ignore their schedule when discussing how great they are this season. Swap those schedules, and I say we're 3-1. Unfortunately, things aren't going to get much easier the rest of the way... very few cupcakes on our schedule.
Well take out your 1-3 record from your opponets records and they are now 7-7.
Maybe thier record is better because they are playing the Steelers?
Just a thought.
dmbmuskie
10-09-2006, 01:11 PM
Well take out your 1-3 record from your opponets records and they are now 7-7.
Maybe thier record is better because they are playing the Steelers?
Just a thought.
We get it. We're not very good.
SteelerMan
10-09-2006, 01:43 PM
Well take out your 1-3 record from your opponets records and they are now 7-7.
Maybe thier record is better because they are playing the Steelers?
Just a thought.
No... I'd say the Dolphins, Jaguars, and Bengals are tougher than the Ravens' Bucs, Raiders, and Browns (both teams played the Chargers).
xBigNastyx
10-09-2006, 02:30 PM
New England manages to prove every year that against the Dolphins, it's better to be lucky than good. They also proved how important Graham is to the offense.
Tom Brady proved yesterday that there's something wrong with him. He's developed a tell as to where and when he'll be throwing (batted balls), he's consistantly missing receivers on correct routes (the "lack of familiarity" excuse no longer holds water), and his pocket awareness is slipping.
The defense still is capable of giving up the big play and disappear for minutes at a time. If yesterday had been against the Jets, Pennington's short passing game would have utterly shattered the Pats. Joey Harrington, Wes Welker, and Randy McMicheal picked this team apart. I look at those typed words and blood shoots out of my nose. Had it not been for a bad INT and a tipped ball INT, Miami very likely walks out with a victory. Yikes.
Apparently, nobody got the memo to Belichick (happy, douchebag?) that 2nd and 9 isn't a good place to be, seeing as how many times he threw Malroney or Dillon at the center of the Dolphins defense to be stuffed. I'm sure the Pats have two very sore RBs this morning.
Let us give thanks for the bye week and hope some collective heads get pulled out of some collective asses. It'll be easy to cruise to the AFC East title, but this team has some serious flaws right now that the Colts and Bears are going to exploit to the tune of blowouts.
Well thought out read.
But grow up man, come on seriously.
Right. I attacked you personally and started the whole shebang. I'll get to work on growing up right away, dad.
Tiduwho
10-09-2006, 02:52 PM
I love how the Bears are the only team that "hasn't played anybody".
Indy? Texans, Jets, Titans, and ALMOST LOST the two latter ones. Oppenents record: 8-15
Balti? Raiders, Cleveland, Tampa. Wow, what proof. 4-13
San Di? Titans, Raiders, depleted Steelers. 5-12
Philly? Texans, 49ers, Packers. Clearly they are beating the best there is to offer. 8-14
Chicago? Weak division, Buffalo. 9-14.
WOAH, what the fuck? Are you shitting me? Your telling me the Bears schedule has actually been HARDER than these "legit" contenders?
And you're also telling me that the point margin differential is:
Bears 156
Opp 36
120 points? How about the others?
Indy: 35
Balt: 53
Sand: 73
Philly: 58
Well I think we can all see that the Bears ARE NOT for real, while these teams are all legit and proven.
xBigNastyx
10-09-2006, 02:53 PM
Right. I attacked you personally and started the whole shebang. I'll get to work on growing up right away, dad.
Truce? Since we are both Pats fans, we should get along lol.
xBigNastyx
10-09-2006, 02:55 PM
I love how the Bears are the only team that "hasn't played anybody".
Indy? Texans, Jets, Titans, and ALMOST LOST the two latter ones. Oppenents record: 8-15
Balti? Raiders, Cleveland, Tampa. Wow, what proof. 4-13
San Di? Titans, Raiders, depleted Steelers. 5-12
Philly? Texans, 49ers, Packers. Clearly they are beating the best there is to offer. 8-14
Chicago? Weak division, Buffalo. 9-14.
WOAH, what the fuck? Are you shitting me? Your telling me the Bears schedule has actually been HARDER than these "legit" contenders?
And you're also telling me that the point margin differential is:
Bears 156
Opp 36
120 points? How about the others?
Indy: 35
Balt: 53
Sand: 73
Philly: 58
Well I think we can all see that the Bears ARE NOT for real, while these teams are all legit and proven.
Indy is the most over rated team, year in, year out.
The Bears are for real, who said they werent?
Tiduwho
10-09-2006, 02:59 PM
Indy is the most over rated team, year in, year out.
The Bears are for real, who said they werent?
No one here per se, I just wanted to post it for the naysayers who just won't stop saying "So what, the Bears haven't played anyone."
SteelerMan
10-09-2006, 02:59 PM
Yeah... I was just saying how easy the Ravens schedule was ON THIS VERY PAGE.
xBigNastyx
10-09-2006, 03:12 PM
Yeah... I was just saying how easy the Ravens schedule was ON THIS VERY PAGE.
And?
SteelerMan
10-09-2006, 03:17 PM
And?
He was saying how the Bears are the only team people are saying "haven't played anybody", yet I had just said the Ravens haven't played anybody.
41ravens
10-09-2006, 03:49 PM
No one here per se, I just wanted to post it for the naysayers who just won't stop saying "So what, the Bears haven't played anyone."
they haven't. and they don't for the next month. the real test is the three week road trip against the giants, jets and pats. if they come out of there 3-0, i'll give them their due. and we all know that the bears are good in the regular season and choke in the playoffs anyways, so what does the season really matter?
SteelerMan
10-09-2006, 03:58 PM
they haven't. and they don't for the next month. the real test is the three week road trip against the giants, jets and pats. if they come out of there 3-0, i'll give them their due. and we all know that the bears are good in the regular season and choke in the playoffs anyways, so what does the season really matter?
I agree with you except for that last line. That's exactly what people had always said about the Steelers prior to last season.
lmaciolek
10-09-2006, 04:11 PM
No... I'd say the Dolphins, Jaguars, and Bengals are tougher than the Ravens' Bucs, Raiders, and Browns (both teams played the Chargers).
Who knows, the Browns played the game like it was thier Super Bowl. Its like the Dallas-Skins game. No matter how much better 1 team is over another, it will be a close game.
McNair has a lot to prove still, this much is true. He is still learning the offense and I think the second half of the season you will see what the Ravens have to offer. But we are collecting wins right now, and that is all that matters at this point in the season.
Worry about how good a team is when you are about to play them in the playoffs. Being better than another team is no good if you are watching them on TV in Jan.
lmaciolek
10-09-2006, 04:12 PM
I agree with you except for that last line. That's exactly what people had always said about the Steelers prior to last season.
Well Big Ben tried to live up to the standards in the Super Bowl... ;)
lmaciolek
10-09-2006, 04:13 PM
He was saying how the Bears are the only team people are saying "haven't played anybody", yet I had just said the Ravens haven't played anybody.
I know you said it already, but I wanted to point out that they did beat a team that beat the Steelers. :hump
SteelerMan
10-09-2006, 04:17 PM
I know you said it already, but I wanted to point out that they did beat a team that beat the Steelers. :hump
This is true, although that Chargers-Ravens game would've been much more interesting had Marty let Rivers go crazy the way he did in the Steelers game. Rivers is the real deal... I actually think the Chargers have a good chance of going to the Super Bowl.
lmaciolek
10-09-2006, 04:22 PM
This is true, although that Chargers-Ravens game would've been much more interesting had Marty let Rivers go crazy the way he did in the Steelers game. Rivers is the real deal... I actually think the Chargers have a good chance of going to the Super Bowl.
He may be the real deal against your secondary. He really didn't have much success after he was done his 20-25 scripted plays againt the Ravens.
He got picked once early that cost them a TD and he really wasn't the same QB after that, Marty Ball or not.
SteelerMan
10-09-2006, 04:31 PM
He may be the real deal against your secondary. He really didn't have much success after he was done his 20-25 scripted plays againt the Ravens.
He got picked once early that cost them a TD and he really wasn't the same QB after that, Marty Ball or not.
If you're trying to say the Ravens secondary is better than the Steelers, I'm definitely not going to argue with you there. I'd say the Ravens have BY FAR the best secondary in the NFL. I think for his third career start playing against the best secondary in the league on the road, he did pretty well. I'm impressed by how well he reads defenses and takes advantage of blitzes.
lmaciolek
10-09-2006, 04:39 PM
If you're trying to say the Ravens secondary is better than the Steelers, I'm definitely not going to argue with you there. I'd say the Ravens have BY FAR the best secondary in the NFL. I think for his third career start playing against the best secondary in the league on the road, he did pretty well. I'm impressed by how well he reads defenses and takes advantage of blitzes.
True, He did well. We didn't blitz too much, however. I know your D really gets after the QB and sometimes leaves your secondary exposed. I wish our guys did that. We play more of a bend but don't break type D. We figure the more plays it takes you to get into the end zone, the more opportunity you have to mess it up.
Rivers did OK. He is not a rookie though, so I don't anticipate him making rookie mistakes. He does have the best RB in the league and the Best TE in the league, that can really help your learning curve.
The Ravens did leave about 14 points out there on the field which made the game very close. If Mason doesn't lose that ball in the sun and Wilcox does some sort of move before getting smacked on the 1 and fumbling, we win by a wider margin.
I do like the fact that Phillip Rivers is 0-5 against the state of MD.
0-4 Against the UMD Terps
0-1 Against the Baltimore Ravens. :D
xBigNastyx
10-09-2006, 05:15 PM
True, He did well. We didn't blitz too much, however. I know your D really gets after the QB and sometimes leaves your secondary exposed. I wish our guys did that. We play more of a bend but don't break type D. We figure the more plays it takes you to get into the end zone, the more opportunity you have to mess it up.
Rivers did OK. He is not a rookie though, so I don't anticipate him making rookie mistakes. He does have the best RB in the league and the Best TE in the league, that can really help your learning curve.
The Ravens did leave about 14 points out there on the field which made the game very close. If Mason doesn't lose that ball in the sun and Wilcox does some sort of move before getting smacked on the 1 and fumbling, we win by a wider margin.
I do like the fact that Phillip Rivers is 0-5 against the state of MD.
0-4 Against the UMD Terps
0-1 Against the Baltimore Ravens. :D
They have the best TE reciever in the league. But not the best all around TE, blocking included...
thebigv
10-09-2006, 05:37 PM
Kellen Winslow II is finally starting to look like his father and less like a jackass. Gates is being under-utilized this season.
lmaciolek
10-09-2006, 06:06 PM
They have the best TE reciever in the league. But not the best all around TE, blocking included...
Well you can't have both.
Who would you make the best TE all around in the league?
Since you shot mine down.
Tiduwho
10-09-2006, 06:16 PM
they haven't. and they don't for the next month. the real test is the three week road trip against the giants, jets and pats. if they come out of there 3-0, i'll give them their due. and we all know that the bears are good in the regular season and choke in the playoffs anyways, so what does the season really matter?
Two times in 20 years = always. I see.
An 11 and 5 team that loses at home by a touchdown is a choke job? Well, the Bears are the only team that did that I guess, right? I mean, the Giants didn't even score a point at home and lost by 4 scores, but that didn't stop anyone from saying "They could win the East and go all the way to the Super Bowl".
One score....4 scores. The team that lost by one score = "blown out and exposed". The team that couldn't score a point is a legit Super Bowl contender coming into the season.
lmaciolek
10-09-2006, 06:18 PM
Two times in 20 years = always. I see.
I know, the bears have to get to the post season a little more before we can say always. ;)
Tiduwho
10-09-2006, 06:27 PM
Losing by God knows how many points in the NFC Championship game? Oh, that's okay. For next year that proved that they were everyone and their mom's Super Bowl Champs AND made them the highest rated defense. Because in the playoffs they let one of the worst offenses in the league score 21 on them, and then let Seattle score 34. That is PROOF that they should be rated the best defense and be Super Bowl favorites.
Remember guys, just listen to whoever gets the hype and the "shoulds", who cares about the actual stats.
Tiduwho
10-09-2006, 06:46 PM
I did say 20 years, and the Bears playoff record over that span is 7 and 9. Shouldn't it be a lot worse? I thought they "always" choke in the playoffs? I thought the Bears were only good for one completely fluke year in '85 and every other year they've been one and done?
If only I could learn how to judge teams for "real" like our buddy 41ravens. Don't evaluate talent, just go by "shoulds" and what happened last time.
xBigNastyx
10-09-2006, 07:11 PM
I did say 20 years, and the Bears playoff record over that span is 7 and 9. Shouldn't it be a lot worse? I thought they "always" choke in the playoffs? I thought the Bears were only good for one completely fluke year in '85 and every other year they've been one and done?
If only I could learn how to judge teams for "real" like our buddy 41ravens. Don't evaluate talent, just go by "shoulds" and what happened last time.
He's a Dallas fan, what do you expect?
UNC41
10-09-2006, 08:45 PM
Losing by God knows how many points in the NFC Championship game? Oh, that's okay. For next year that proved that they were everyone and their mom's Super Bowl Champs AND made them the highest rated defense. Because in the playoffs they let one of the worst offenses in the league score 21 on them, and then let Seattle score 34. That is PROOF that they should be rated the best defense and be Super Bowl favorites.
Remember guys, just listen to whoever gets the hype and the "shoulds", who cares about the actual stats.
The Bears have been the best team in the NFL so far, but it's far too early to anoint anyone Super Bowl favorites.
BotheDMBFan
10-09-2006, 08:55 PM
Of the 3 undefeated teams, I'd say the Bears have the best chance of going undefeated(not saying they, or anyone ever will) but of the teams left, Bears are looking pretty good.
GavMan33
10-09-2006, 10:03 PM
Just thought I'd tell this little story to stir it up in here a little bit (keep in mind I don't like either team, but I do go to school in Cincinnati):
We're taking an English test earlier tonight, and this kid next to me looks up from his paper and starts shakin his hand because he's been writing so much. My professor looks at him and goes, "What's the matter? You look like little Ben after he throws another interception!" Needless to say, there was a large uproar in my class. I thought it was funny....
Now, that said, let's go Bills!
Or better yet, let's try not to get thoroughly embarassed anymore.....
dmbmuskie
10-09-2006, 10:18 PM
Just thought I'd tell this little story to stir it up in here a little bit (keep in mind I don't like either team, but I do go to school in Cincinnati):
We're taking an English test earlier tonight, and this kid next to me looks up from his paper and starts shakin his hand because he's been writing so much. My professor looks at him and goes, "What's the matter? You look like little Ben after he throws another interception!" Needless to say, there was a large uproar in my class. I thought it was funny....
Now, that said, let's go Bills!
Or better yet, let's try not to get thoroughly embarassed anymore.....
Bengals fans are just the worst.
GavMan33
10-09-2006, 10:32 PM
Bengals fans are just the worst.
I whole-heartedly agree with you. Not that I like the Steelers much either, but I cannot stand this city during football season :BANG
dmbmuskie
10-09-2006, 10:38 PM
I whole-heartedly agree with you. Not that I like the Steelers much either, but I cannot stand this city during football season :BANG
I'd be so pissed if I was taking a test, and a professor broke my concentration to crack on a NFL rival.
I'm pretty sure the Steelers season is done, so I'll be rooting for whoever is playing for the Bengals hard ever weekend. I'll take great pleasure in seeing their opponents stuff the ball down their throats on offense and beat them up on defense.
Just so the Bengals fans who see this don't call be a fairweather fan, I'll still watch the Steelers every week, and I hope they win. However, digging out of a 1-3 hole is next to impossible. We're not very good, and I accept this.
SteelerMan
10-09-2006, 11:10 PM
I'd be so pissed if I was taking a test, and a professor broke my concentration to crack on a NFL rival.
I'm pretty sure the Steelers season is done, so I'll be rooting for whoever is playing for the Bengals hard ever weekend. I'll take great pleasure in seeing their opponents stuff the ball down their throats on offense and beat them up on defense.
Just so the Bengals fans who see this don't call be a fairweather fan, I'll still watch the Steelers every week, and I hope they win. However, digging out of a 1-3 hole is next to impossible. We're not very good, and I accept this.
Don't throw in the towel yet. I like our chances in the next three games (Chiefs, Falcons, Raiders)... we win those three, and we're back over .500. I'm not predicting we will, but I think those are all very winnable games.
seekupig
10-09-2006, 11:35 PM
it sucks i'm going to Pittsburgh this weekend to see the Chiefs and they'll likely be without their three most important offensive players...... :BANG
they're saying LJ is ok, but if his neck is still sore he may not play......
Chief concerns: Hall uncertain, L.J. OK, but Green out
http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/news/story?id=2618869
this may be just what the Steelers needed to feel good about themselves again.
Tiduwho
10-10-2006, 12:14 AM
The Bears have been the best team in the NFL so far, but it's far too early to anoint anyone Super Bowl favorites.
No, read it again. I was talking about Carolina and how they did in the playoffs last year. Despite giving 55 points in two weeks and getting blown out by 3 scores, they were annointed as Super Bowl Champs and the best defense in the NFL coming into the season.
I was speaking in jest.
BotheDMBFan
10-10-2006, 12:39 AM
Bengals fans are just the worst.
No, that'd be Eagles fans. Then Pats fans. Then Steelers fans.
SteelerMan
10-10-2006, 12:47 AM
No, that'd be Eagles fans. Then Pats fans. Then Steelers fans.
Hmm... sounds like someone is associating "worst fans" with "most outspoken fans". Maybe it's just me, but I consider the "worst fans" to be those who only show up every time their team starts winning (I'm looking at you Bengals fans).
xBigNastyx
10-10-2006, 12:47 AM
No, that'd be Eagles fans. Then Pats fans. Then Steelers fans.
Wow.
UNC41
10-10-2006, 12:48 AM
No, read it again. I was talking about Carolina and how they did in the playoffs last year. Despite giving 55 points in two weeks and getting blown out by 3 scores, they were annointed as Super Bowl Champs and the best defense in the NFL coming into the season.
I was speaking in jest.
I read it again, and jest, like sarcasm, is often hard to come by in print. Also, hindsight is 20/20. On paper Carolina was the most talented NFC team coming into the seasons. They actually play the games though, to show that what is on paper at the beginning of the season is often useless months later.
BotheDMBFan
10-10-2006, 12:54 AM
Hmm... sounds like someone is associating "worst fans" with "most outspoken fans". Maybe it's just me, but I consider the "worst fans" to be those who only show up every time their team starts winning (I'm looking at you Bengals fans).
Patriots fans are a great example of what you just said.
To soem extent, so are Steelers fans.
SteelerMan
10-10-2006, 12:58 AM
Patriots fans are a great example of what you just said.
To soem extent, so are Steelers fans.
I'm not sure about Patriots fans... I'm so far from the area and paid such little attention to them prior to them winning the Super Bowl that I really don't know what their fanbase was like. I have no idea how you can accuse Steelers fans of being fairweather fans... yes, they bitch A LOT about the team when things are going poorly, but they still go to games and care about the team.
BotheDMBFan
10-10-2006, 12:59 AM
I'm not sure about Patriots fans... I'm so far from the area and paid such little attention to them prior to them winning the Super Bowl that I really don't know what their fanbase was like. I have no idea how you can accuse Steelers fans of being fairweather fans... yes, they bitch A LOT about the team when things are going poorly, but they still go to games and care about the team.
That's why I said "to some extent"
The ones out side of Pittsburgh are very much like this for the most part.
xBigNastyx
10-10-2006, 01:08 AM
Patriots fans are a great example of what you just said.
To soem extent, so are Steelers fans.
Hardly. I'm a Pats fan and I've always been there. Don't make stupid ass generalizations like that, especially when you have absolutely no idea what you are talking about man.
Tiduwho
10-10-2006, 02:14 AM
I read it again, and jest, like sarcasm, is often hard to come by in print. Also, hindsight is 20/20. On paper Carolina was the most talented NFC team coming into the seasons. They actually play the games though, to show that what is on paper at the beginning of the season is often useless months later.
If ONLY they did this in College. Stupid BCS.
dmbisgod
10-10-2006, 02:16 AM
Seahawk NATION
xBigNastyx
10-10-2006, 02:23 AM
Seahawk NATION
Seattle is over rated.
dmbisgod
10-10-2006, 02:25 AM
Seattle is over rated.
i disagree..
xBigNastyx
10-10-2006, 02:28 AM
i disagree..
Are you a Seahawks fan?
dmbisgod
10-10-2006, 02:34 AM
Are you a Seahawks fan?
im the 12th man
xBigNastyx
10-10-2006, 02:54 AM
im the 12th man
That would explain why you don't think they are over rated. :lol
lmaciolek
10-10-2006, 08:05 AM
I'm not sure about Patriots fans... I'm so far from the area and paid such little attention to them prior to them winning the Super Bowl that I really don't know what their fanbase was like. I have no idea how you can accuse Steelers fans of being fairweather fans... yes, they bitch A LOT about the team when things are going poorly, but they still go to games and care about the team.
***I read your post wrong and had to edit the first part***
I don't think Boston/New England Fans are fair weather. They have supported the Sox through 86 seasons of losing and I am pretty sure they were around before the Pats went on thier SB run.
Every city has Fair weathers to be sure, we have the same in the Baltimore area. I think its easy to point out the Bengals because they have been so poor for so long, you forgot they had any fan base to speak of.
BotheDMBFan
10-10-2006, 08:27 AM
Here's my top 5.
1. Colts
2. Bears
3. Broncos
4. Eagles
5. Ravens
Uhhh... The Colts just beat the Titans by one point. One. They can't stop the run. They're nowhere near the level of the Bears right now.
1. Bears.
2. Everybody else.
In all seriousness...
1. Bears
2. Broncos
3. Colts
4. Ravens
5. Eagles
I can't be enough of a homer to put the Pats in the top 5. They just didn't look good this week. Granted, they never look good against the Dolphins, and they have an incredibly annoying habit of doing just enough to beat teams. Blah.
SteelerMan
10-10-2006, 08:53 AM
I guess I'll post my Top 5 as well...
1. Bears
2. Broncos
3. Chargers
4. Colts
5. Eagles
I don't care that the Ravens beat the Chargers... the Chargers are the better team.
BotheDMBFan
10-10-2006, 09:03 AM
Uhhh... The Colts just beat the Titans by one point. One. They can't stop the run. They're nowhere near the level of the Bears right now.
1. Bears.
2. Everybody else.
In all seriousness...
1. Bears
2. Broncos
3. Colts
4. Ravens
5. Eagles
I can't be enough of a homer to put the Pats in the top 5. They just didn't look good this week. Granted, they never look good against the Dolphins, and they have an incredibly annoying habit of doing just enough to beat teams. Blah.
Dude, I'm jsut afraid to put Da Bears #1.......mainly because I'm a fan.
Bartender84
10-10-2006, 10:48 AM
Seattle is over rated.
Most people said they were overrated last year too. They need to work on the defense after that Chicago game though if they're going to have another shot at it.
SteelerMan
10-10-2006, 11:07 AM
I think Seattle's Super Bowl hopes died when they lost Hutchinson.
dmbmuskie
10-10-2006, 12:16 PM
No, that'd be Eagles fans. Then Pats fans. Then Steelers fans.
That's not even close to accurate.
dmbmuskie
10-10-2006, 12:20 PM
1. Bears
2. Colts
3. Chargers
4. Eagles
5. Carolina
6. Denver
32. Raiders
SteelerMan
10-10-2006, 12:25 PM
I'm getting pretty sick of the Bears hype. Yes, they're the best team right now, but people are already thinking they could go undefeated. Joe Theismann even PREDICTED they'd go undefeated last night. Give me a break. Yet another reason I don't pay attention to this stuff.
dmbmuskie
10-10-2006, 12:43 PM
I'm getting pretty sick of the Bears hype. Yes, they're the best team right now, but people are already thinking they could go undefeated. Joe Theismann even PREDICTED they'd go undefeated last night. Give me a break. Yet another reason I don't pay attention to this stuff.
Everything that comes out of Theisman is garbage.
SteelerMan
10-10-2006, 12:44 PM
Everything that comes out of Theisman is garbage.
:thumbsup
Agreed. Give me Madden over Theisman any day. Theisman is just unbearable.
dmbmuskie
10-10-2006, 12:48 PM
:thumbsup
Agreed. Give me Madden over Theisman any day. Theisman is just unbearable.
Madden has gotten pretty bad as well, but he's 20 years older than Theisman. I think Phill Sims does the best job as a color man right now.
AFurth
10-10-2006, 12:48 PM
I'm getting pretty sick of the Bears hype. Yes, they're the best team right now, but people are already thinking they could go undefeated. Joe Theismann even PREDICTED they'd go undefeated last night. Give me a break. Yet another reason I don't pay attention to this stuff.
Well theoretically, what happens if he's right.
Not saying that he will be - but that 16-0 season is going to happen. If Randy Moss and co. (earlier this decade) can go 15-1, and teams fo 14-2 every year, who's to say perfect can't be done?
And what's going to beat the bears? running? passing? tonya harding?
dmbmuskie
10-10-2006, 12:52 PM
Well theoretically, what happens if he's right.
Not saying that he will be - but that 16-0 season is going to happen. If Randy Moss and co. (earlier this decade) can go 15-1, and teams fo 14-2 every year, who's to say perfect can't be done?
And what's going to beat the bears? running? passing? tonya harding?
It's okay to talk about in about 6 weeks. Until then they're just playing good football.
UNC41
10-10-2006, 12:56 PM
And what's going to beat the bears? running? passing? tonya harding?
An off game? A team playing better than them one Sunday? Not getting breaks one week?
As impressive as the Bears have been thus far, it's just stupid to think the Bears cannot be beat on any given Sunday.
SteelerMan
10-10-2006, 01:01 PM
An off game? A team playing better than them one Sunday? Not getting breaks one week?
As impressive as the Bears have been thus far, it's just stupid to think the Bears cannot be beat on any given Sunday.
:thumbsup
Correct. Especially when their starting quarterback has yet to play a full season without getting injured.
dmbmuskie
10-10-2006, 01:07 PM
:thumbsup
Correct. Especially when their starting quarterback has yet to play a full season without getting injured.
It's not just that. The season is young. Some coach is going to find some weaknesses in them, and exploit them. After than everyteam is going to copy that strategy, tweak it a little, and they will lose.
SteelerMan
10-10-2006, 01:10 PM
Yeah... weren't the Colts supposed to go undefeated and win the Super Bowl last year?
dmbmuskie
10-10-2006, 01:11 PM
Yeah... weren't the Colts supposed to go undefeated and win the Super Bowl last year?
Yeah, the NFL really wanted them to win.
xBigNastyx
10-10-2006, 02:19 PM
Uhhh... The Colts just beat the Titans by one point. One. They can't stop the run. They're nowhere near the level of the Bears right now.
1. Bears.
2. Everybody else.
In all seriousness...
1. Bears
2. Broncos
3. Colts
4. Ravens
5. Eagles
I can't be enough of a homer to put the Pats in the top 5. They just didn't look good this week. Granted, they never look good against the Dolphins, and they have an incredibly annoying habit of doing just enough to beat teams. Blah.
The Pats are better than the Colts/ Ravens. The Colts are undefeated barely because they haven't played anybody and they are squeeking by crappy teams.
Tiduwho
10-10-2006, 02:21 PM
Even if the Bears get through that 3 game road trip still undefeated after week 12, they will be resting all their starters the rest of the way unless the Viqueens win out until then. Kyle Throat Beard would be starting the last couple games, because they wouldn't even put Griese out there. Favre in possibly his last game ever on New Years Eve against a Kyle Orton led Bears? Favre will work his magic and I can almost gurantee he'll have a good sendoff.
But to put the Colts ahead of the Bears is ludicrous right now. The Colts can't stop the run against anyone. They've almost lost to the Jets and Titans in successive weeks.
If anyone can find a weakness in the Bears and exploit them, it's Donovan F. McNabb. I don't want any part of them in the playoffs.
UNC41
10-10-2006, 02:23 PM
The Pats are better than the Colts/ Ravens. The Colts are undefeated barely because they haven't played anybody and they are squeeking by crappy teams.
So are the Pats.
Tiduwho
10-10-2006, 02:28 PM
Some stats analysis I posted on ESPN, might as well go it here:
Guess who has the #1 Defense, Offense, AND Special Teams?
Yup, it's the Bears for all three.
#1 in scoring defense and scoring OFFENSE. It's too bad the Bears only play 3 quarters, so their yards suffer accordingly. They are only 4th in the league in offensive yards (356.4 yds, 1 yard behind Indy for 3rd) , despite playing "Griese hands off the ball to Cedric Benson for the entire 4th quarter" for 3 of their 5 games.
Sucks for Grossman's MVP chances, McNabb's played 3 more quarters then him. It's unfair, but I'm sure no one will take that into account. But I digress:
Scoring Offense
1. Bears - 31.2 pts
2. Eagles - 31
3. Dallas - 28.2
4. Indy - 27.0
5. San Diego - 25.8
Scoring Defense
1. Bears - 7.2
2. Denver - 8.5
3. San Diego - 9
4. Balti - 9.2
5. Falcons - 10.5
Robbie Gould is 17 for 17 in field goals. Brad Maynard is 5th in Net avg with 8 of his 19 punts inside the 20. Devin Hester is incredibly fast and is a threat to take it all the way any time he has the ball (the only problem is he needs to catch the ball against his body, at least he hasn't lost any fumbles).
By the way, weren't the Bears supposed to have no offense, and wasn't Grossman supposed to be gone by week 4? I thought Grossman and Griese were only slightly better than Kyle Throat Beard? For the record, every single starter is the same as last year...except one: Rex Grossman.
lmaciolek
10-10-2006, 02:34 PM
I guess I'll post my Top 5 as well...
1. Bears
2. Broncos
3. Chargers
4. Colts
5. Eagles
I don't care that the Ravens beat the Chargers... the Chargers are the better team.
I don't know if the Chargers belong in the 3 slot. Just because they put a whoppin on the Steelers doesn't make them legit.
dmbmuskie
10-10-2006, 03:21 PM
But to put the Colts ahead of the Bears is ludicrous right now. The Colts can't stop the run against anyone. They've almost lost to the Jets and Titans in successive weeks.
Hasn't anyone learned their lesson about resting the starters yet? If they are healthy they should play and keep their edge.
dmbmuskie
10-10-2006, 03:23 PM
I don't know if the Chargers belong in the 3 slot. Just because they put a whoppin on the Steelers doesn't make them legit.
The fact that they beat the Steelers has nothing to do with me ranking them there. The Bengals beat the Steelers, and I think they totally suck. The Chargers defense is incredible, and the offense is going to get better every week.
EDIT: Nevermind. I thought those were my rankings.
xBigNastyx
10-10-2006, 03:30 PM
So are the Pats.
They destroyed the Bengals who are a good team. What good team has the Colts beaten up on? How is the Colts run D, how is their running game? Ok then.
Next please?
SteelerMan
10-10-2006, 03:36 PM
I don't know if the Chargers belong in the 3 slot. Just because they put a whoppin on the Steelers doesn't make them legit.
Aside from the Bears, the Chargers are the most balanced and complete team I've seen this year. They should be undefeated, but Schottenheimer pissed away that Ravens game. I'd actually say Schottenheimer's gameplan is their weakest link.
GavMan33
10-10-2006, 04:15 PM
The Pats are better than the Colts/ Ravens. The Colts are undefeated barely because they haven't played anybody and they are squeeking by crappy teams.
I'm sorry bro, I have to ask. Not too many posts ago in this thread you called somebody out for saying the Seahawks are not overrated, and you asked if he was a Seattle fan. He responded by saying he's the 12th man, and you said that's why he doesn't think they're overrated. The same argument would apply here, my friend....
Trippin4136
10-10-2006, 04:32 PM
The Pats are better than the Colts/ Ravens. The Colts are undefeated barely because they haven't played anybody and they are squeeking by crappy teams.
Pats: Bills, Jets, Broncos, Bengals, Dolphins.
Colts: Giants, Texas, Jaguars, Jets, Titans
So the Pats lost to the best team on their schedule, and a better team, and beat the Bengals and play in a division that isn't blowing anyone's skirt up by beating the Bills, Jets and Dolphins by a combined 19 points.
The Colts beat the Giants and Jaguars, both who are not total pushovers ("total" is more directed at my Giants) and beat 2 other weak divisional opponents.
Neither team has beaten a team one would rank in the top 5 of the league at this moment.
dmbhoosier21
10-10-2006, 04:49 PM
The Pats are better than the Colts/ Ravens. The Colts are undefeated barely because they haven't played anybody and they are squeeking by crappy teams.
The Bears opponents' record - 9-15
The Colts record 8-15
-Ummmm, I really don't see that big of a difference there
And the Colts running offense is steadily taking shape (check last two games) - Indy's running game will be in the top ten by the end of the season with Addai and Rhodes.
And with the Colts run defense.......well even I can't defend that pathetic excuse for a run defense
With all that being said, I am not at all arguing for the Colts being better than the Bears at this point. The Bears are definitely the best team at this stage of the season. And I disagree, the Pats and Ravens are not better than the Colts.
The thing that I am somewhat excited about are that the Colts are playing about as bad as any team out there (relative to their abilities). Anyone who has followed the Colts the last few years would agree that they are playing like absolute crap.....yet somehow they have managed to stay undefeated. Manning and the Colts had no close/tough games where they had to manufacture game-winning/tying drives until the playoffs last season. So far this season, Manning has had two, and the defense was able to stop a game-winning drive by an opponent already - that's 3 for the year. Tough/close games will serve them well come playoff time.
If people are banking on the Colts' offense scoring below 20 pts in a game.....well, let's just say that is not probably going to happen too many times in the future. The Colts offense has been sub-par and are still a top 5 offense in the league.
How many teams in the league can manage a 5-0 record while playing like absolute crap?
Basically, yes the Colts are playing like shit and the Bears are better than anyone, BUT the Colts are still 5-0 (while playing like crap) and it's WAAAY to early to be punching in any SB tix at this stage of the season. I should know I am a Colts fan.
UNC41
10-10-2006, 05:54 PM
They destroyed the Bengals who are a good team. What good team has the Colts beaten up on? How is the Colts run D, how is their running game? Ok then.
Next please?
The Bengals game and the Colts defense has nothing to do with the fact that the Pats are also squeaking by crappy teams as you said.
Buffalo - 2
Jets - 7
Miami - 10
Next please?
dmbhoosier21
10-10-2006, 06:12 PM
The way I see it; Chicago is the only team who has separated themselves from the rest of the league
The "other" elite teams are teams such as Indy, Pats, SD, Phil etc......but I think it is really hard to distinctly separate those teams from one other at this stage of the season. Just look at past SB teams, who struggled early during the reg. season but then ended up winning it all - the Steelers last year is a great example.
xBigNastyx
10-10-2006, 06:26 PM
The Bengals game and the Colts defense has nothing to do with the fact that the Pats are also squeaking by crappy teams as you said.
Buffalo - 2
Jets - 7
Miami - 10
Next please?
I disagree that the Colts are better all around team than the Patriots. I guess you all will find out come playoff time when the Colts lay down again.
UNC41
10-10-2006, 06:32 PM
I disagree that the Colts are better all around team than the Patriots. I guess you all will find out come playoff time when the Colts lay down again.
Which team is better is an opinion that will differ among people right now. I just don't find it smart to knock the Colts for squeaking out wins against bad teams when yours has been doing the exact same thing.
Yeah, there's nothing to stand on with the Pats right now. They had an incredible showing against the Bungles, but have barely beaten sub-par teams in the Jets, Dolphins, and Bills. The team is capable of alot more, but Brady is teh suck right now, they have no WR threat, and the defense is a complete crapshoot from play to play.
i listen to #41
10-10-2006, 06:55 PM
Why are the Dolphins so good this year?
dmbhoosier21
10-10-2006, 07:14 PM
Yeah, there's nothing to stand on with the Pats right now. They had an incredible showing against the Bungles, but have barely beaten sub-par teams in the Jets, Dolphins, and Bills. The team is capable of alot more, but Brady is teh suck right now, they have no WR threat, and the defense is a complete crapshoot from play to play.
I hate homers who can't see the faults with their own teams - obviously you are not one of those people
but, nothing can compare to the ineptitude of the Colt's run defense - their D-line gets pushed 3 yards off the ball and subsquently the LBs overrun or attempt an arm-tackle on the ball carrier who proceeds to gain another 5 yards on the play. :BANG
This is not bitching - just watch a Colts game
Again, the Bears seem to be the only team to be without any glaring weaknesses. The rest of the "elite" teams definitely have some areas that they need to improve upon - thus making any bold playoff prediction at wk. 5-6 about any team as being completely worthless. Especially when it has been shown the last few years that teams who struggled early-mid reg. season have ended up winning the SB (i.e. the Steelers)
Why are the Dolphins so good this year?
Yeah, they're well on their way to winning the AFC (and ultimately, the Super Bowl) just like the experts predicted! :lol
xBigNastyx
10-10-2006, 07:38 PM
I hate homers who can't see the faults with their own teams - obviously you are not one of those people
but, nothing can compare to the ineptitude of the Colt's run defense - their D-line gets pushed 3 yards off the ball and subsquently the LBs overrun or attempt an arm-tackle on the ball carrier who proceeds to gain another 5 yards on the play. :BANG
This is not bitching - just watch a Colts game
Again, the Bears seem to be the only team to be without any glaring weaknesses. The rest of the "elite" teams definitely have some areas that they need to improve upon - thus making any bold playoff prediction at wk. 5-6 about any team as being completely worthless. Especially when it has been shown the last few years that teams who struggled early-mid reg. season have ended up winning the SB (i.e. the Steelers)
I hope that's not intended at me. If it is, forgive me for thinking the Pats are better than the Colts. :rolleyes
dmbhoosier21
10-10-2006, 07:47 PM
I hope that's not intended at me. If it is, forgive me for thinking the Pats are better than the Colts. :rolleyes
I would not fault anyone for thinking their team is better than the Colts (to a certain extent, i.e. a Texans fan claiming the same opinion would be dumb)
I just think it is worthless to predict how the playoffs are going to play out considering we are not even halfway through the regular season.
Some teams will improve and some will get worse, there will be injuries and other variables that will play out through the season.
Just look at last year, Colts looked unbeatable at this point (similar to the bears) while the Steelers struggled through parts of the reg. season.
You can make the claim that the Pats are better than the Colts right now, that is definitely debatable and possible but......
Making such bold predictions about the playoffs at this stage of the season is completely baseless and is therefore worthless. :rolleyes
dmbmuskie
10-11-2006, 12:49 PM
Again, the Bears seem to be the only team to be without any glaring weaknesses. The rest of the "elite" teams definitely have some areas that they need to improve upon - thus making any bold playoff prediction at wk. 5-6 about any team as being completely worthless. Especially when it has been shown the last few years that teams who struggled early-mid reg. season have ended up winning the SB (i.e. the Steelers)
I know people are going to disagree with this, but the Bears have a weakness, Rex Grossman. As we speak coaches are looking for ways to disrupt what the Bears do, and once they find something that works we don't know how Rex will react.
I also don't know how anyone can forget what Carolina did to the in the playoffs last year.
xBigNastyx
10-11-2006, 01:06 PM
I know people are going to disagree with this, but the Bears have a weakness, Rex Grossman. As we speak coaches are looking for ways to disrupt what the Bears do, and once they find something that works we don't know how Rex will react.
I also don't know how anyone can forget what Carolina did to the in the playoffs last year.
Good points. Right now the Bears look like the best team. But that's RIGHT NOW, week 6. Not week 17. Things change. Anyone who is writing them down already as in the superbowl is a fool.
Trippin4136
10-11-2006, 01:15 PM
anyone who writes any team down at Week 6 in the Super Bowl is a fool
xBigNastyx
10-11-2006, 01:16 PM
anyone who writes any team down at Week 6 in the Super Bowl is a fool
That's what I was implying...
Trippin4136
10-11-2006, 01:19 PM
thats just how football is....I don't even think it works in Week 17. You never know who survives the playoffs.
Bartndrpleez
10-11-2006, 01:21 PM
Yeah, they're well on their way to winning the AFC (and ultimately, the Super Bowl) just like the experts predicted! :lol
You damn right! And we got JOEY HARRINGTON to lead us to the promise land!!! :lol
:(
dmbmuskie
10-11-2006, 01:32 PM
It's funny to me that we've had 5 weeks of football, and seemingly 5 different Super Bowl favorites.
Week 1 was Carolina.
Week 2 was Indy.
Week 4 was Cincy
Week 6 is Chicago.
It's all bullshit.
xBigNastyx
10-11-2006, 01:33 PM
You damn right! And we got JOEY HARRINGTON to lead us to the promise land!!! :lol
:(
Yeah getting Culpepper wasn't the best move. Shoulda got Brees. IMO Daunte has been what I call a fantasy QB who isn't that good in real life. When he was good, he had Randy Moss in his prime and would just chuck the ball deep and Moss would go get it. Culpepper is NOT a good red zone QB, he isn't very good at reading defensive schemes, and he just doesn't make good decisions IMO.
dmbmuskie
10-11-2006, 01:35 PM
Yeah getting Culpepper wasn't the best move. Shoulda got Brees. IMO Daunte has been what I call a fantasy QB who isn't that good in real life. When he was good, he had Randy Moss in his prime and would just chuck the ball deep and Moss would go get it. Culpepper is NOT a good red zone QB, he isn't very good at reading defensive schemes, and he just doesn't make good decisions IMO.
In Culpepper's defense he's still rehabbing.
Trippin4136
10-11-2006, 01:38 PM
In Culpepper's defense he's still rehabbing.
no kidding...he did get his knee completely exploded.
xBigNastyx
10-11-2006, 01:41 PM
In Culpepper's defense he's still rehabbing.
I'm not talking about this year, I am talking about his career. He put up good numbers because he could just go deep to Moss and Moss would catch anything. Obviously, he is a pretty good QB, but I would never want him as my QB in real life, not this year, not last year, not the year before, and not the year before. He is a fantasy QB who has always been inconsistent. One week he would throw for 400 yds and 3 td, the next 180 yds, a td and 2 picks.
I'm not talking about this year, I am talking about his career. He put up good numbers because he could just go deep to Moss and Moss would catch anything. Obviously, he is a pretty good QB, but I would never want him as my QB in real life, not this year, not last year, not the year before, and not the year before. He is a fantasy QB who has always been inconsistent. One week he would throw for 400 yds and 3 td, the next 180 yds, a td and 2 picks.
Obviously, he's been exposed, but the guy hasn't even played a full season's worth of games dating back to last season. However, if you failed to take him the two years previous to last year then you missed out on 64 TDs versus 22 INTs. I'd say those were some pretty good fantasy numbers.
xBigNastyx
10-11-2006, 01:58 PM
Obviously, he's been exposed, but the guy hasn't even played a full season's worth of games dating back to last season. However, if you failed to take him the two years previous to last year then you missed out on 64 TDs versus 22 INTs. I'd say those were some pretty good fantasy numbers.
Which is EXACTLY why I said he puts up good fantasy numbers, but I wouldn't want him as my real life QB. Do people read entire posts? :lol
Which is EXACTLY why I said he puts up good fantasy numbers, but I wouldn't want him as my real life QB. Do people read entire posts? :lol
Well, I think that would apply to having him as your QB in "real" life, too. He also threw for ~8,000 yards. Those are pretty good numbers in "real" life - which is what I meant.
Tiduwho
10-11-2006, 02:04 PM
anyone who writes any team down at Week 6 in the Super Bowl is a fool
Who in the world is writing anyone into the Super Bowl? :ugh
xBigNastyx
10-11-2006, 02:10 PM
Well, I think that would apply to having him as your QB in "real" life, too. He also threw for ~8,000 yards. Those are pretty good numbers in "real" life - which is what I meant.
I prefer QBs who can lead me down in a 2 minute drill and control the ball, not chuck the ball 80 yards and have his tallest reciever jump up and get it and then give the ball back to the other team cause you only took 4 seconds to score cause anyone can chuck the ball up in the air to Randy Moss. I prefer QBs who can perform in the red zone and have some kind of consistency. Culpepper is a very over rated QB IMO.
xBigNastyx
10-11-2006, 02:12 PM
Who in the world is writing anyone into the Super Bowl? :ugh
I think someone was saying that Chicago are NFC superbowl favorites in here.
SteelerMan
10-11-2006, 02:12 PM
It's funny to me that we've had 5 weeks of football, and seemingly 5 different Super Bowl favorites.
Week 1 was Carolina.
Week 2 was Indy.
Week 4 was Cincy
Week 6 is Chicago.
It's all bullshit.
:thumbsup
Thank you. That's the main reason I can't watch ESPN NFL coverage anymore.
I prefer QBs who can lead me down in a 2 minute drill and control the ball, not chuck the ball 80 yards and have his tallest reciever jump up and get it and then give the ball back to the other team cause you only took 4 seconds to score cause anyone can chuck the ball up in the air to Randy Moss. I prefer QBs who can perform in the red zone and have some kind of consistency. Culpepper is a very over rated QB IMO.
Tell that to the QBs in Oakland. They don't seem to be having the same success Culpepper did. He also had a completion percentage of 65 and 69, respectively. I'd say that's a pretty good job at ball-control. I'm not saying that he's the best but he had two incredible years.
By the way, why did you change your username?
vBulletin® v3.8.6, Copyright ©2000-2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.