Open Mic Night numero dos

[Dancing Ants]

Second time my friend and I have played together in a while..we busted out this nice gem:

Black Dog +
Lie In Our Graves *...>
#40...>
Waiting on An Angel $
Wish You Were Here %
(Are You Gonna Be My Girl) ^...>
All Along the Watchtower #...>
Is It Valentine's Day Yet? @...>
Cortez, the Killer ~

+ Zeppelin cover
* jam only..no lyrics
$ Ben Harper cover
% Pink Floyd cover
() indicates "tease"
^ Jet cover
# Dylan cover
@ Original stuff
~ Neil Young cover


it was a great time...:D :D

[SevenMinarets]

Sounds like a good set. A lot of variety. Two thumbs up.

[PilotC150]

No offense or anything, but why do people insist on putting symbols after every song they play referring to a note at the bottom? Why can you just put Black Dog (Zepplin Cover). It would be so much easier to understand compared to having 10 different footnotes.

[scoot_14]

No offense or anything, but why do people insist on putting symbols after every song they play referring to a note at the bottom? Why can you just put Black Dog (Zepplin Cover). It would be so much easier to understand compared to having 10 different footnotes.

I have to agree, every song has a symbol!

Good set. :)

[Stuntcheeks]

Because - $




$ - That's the way it's done on tapers source files.

[Dancing Ants]

it makes me feel important, Pilot.

[PilotC150]

Because - $




$ - That's the way it's done on tapers source files.


My comment was intended for tapers as well.

[Stuntcheeks]

My comment was intended for tapers as well.

I got nothin', Pilot.

[Erich]

My comment was intended for tapers as well.

cause thats how nancies did it at first.

footnotes would be easier if (1) (2) or superscripts were used instead of !@###~~$$$%#@#. that way the setlist is readible at a glace, and the footnotes are easier to match with the song.

Anyway, setlists are nice to look at, but is there anything for us to hear of this night?