Been thinking about this for a while and figured I'd make a thread about it...
So, is there a reason I'm missing as to why sets can't be more varied (I'm talking more about song placement in sets, not actual song selection...that's a whole other issue)?
One of the best things about going to a live show for me is not knowing what song is going to be played next. I feel like each show on a tour should have a unique opener, closer, and encore for as many songs as this band has in its catalog. I wish I had no idea what the opener was going to be each show. It seems like each tour has its go-to openers/closers/encores. For example, songs like Squirm, Don't Drink the Water, Big Eyed Fish are usually openers. Ants, Two Step, Watchtower either close the main set or encore...etc. etc. So, usually you have a good idea what's gonna come next or how a show will end.
Imagine how much more exciting a tour would be if we didn't have a clear guess as to what was going to be played each night in the power slots as well as in the middle of a set (i.e. Crush being played in the 4-8 slot almost every time). The band would get to test out different ways of constructing a creative set from night to night, making it interesting for them as well.
Why not open with Warehouse one show and have it close the encore the next night? What's there to lose?
I know other people feel frustrated at times with this issue, so what do ya'll think? Is it too late to expect Dave to get crazy with his set writing?