Quote:
Originally Posted by clemson357
Are you arguing that there is a credible case that she is innocent? If that is what you believe, why don't you stick your neck out right now and admit to it?
You deny that you defended wright, and in six more days you will probably denying that you minimized the case against Shakur. You aren't even trying to make a point here, just babbling about one miscellaneous tidbit which doesn't come close to negating the fact that a jury of 12 was convinced beyond a reasonable doubt that she was guilty, she apparently had no plausible case on appeal, and no one here has made any legitimate effort at explaining why she is innocent.
|
I have no idea if there is a credible case that she is innocent. I haven't researched the case anywhere near enough to be able to form an honest opinion on the case. Then again, I'm not making statements demanding that Common should apologize and other such nonsense. I found that tidbit with 5 minutes of quick research. A tidbit that combined with other things could easily make it that there might be a credible case that she is innocent. An officer admitting to falsifying police documents might make me question what he has stated is true or whether he just made up some stuff.
Since you're such an expert, I'm sure you're aware that you're also aware that there was a 4 year gap between the shootings and her conviction. I'm sure that with all the coverage involving the killing of a cop, that the jury would be able to remain impartial.
And once again you buffoon, I never denied that I defended Wright. I said that I never called him a radical, which I challenged you to prove otherwise. Apparently reading comprehension isn't your strong suit.