Quote:
Originally Posted by Gene Parmesan
I'd buy the same amount.
They know they are screwing consumers out of less product, thus the inclusion of the word 'long'.
Just like they justified getting rid of openers in the first place by giving us '2 sets' that amounted to 1 set plus 2 songs.
|
I just don't understand why you feel screwed because this news came out after you paid, if you would buy the same amount anyways.
Use of "long" - Exactly right. Just stating it's going back to the old style set which is "longer" than the each or the two sets. I have zero issue with this usage. I'm the first one to call organizations our for BS, I think attacking the use of long to make you feel better, because deep down they know they screwed us is a stretch.
Quote:
Originally Posted by flutterby
I see this different. I'm wondering if they will now sell MORE tickets because they're going back to one set. Two sets were stale and predictable. You've gotta think that hurt sales.
|
I've heard some say they may go to more shows now, so yes, but I could argue even "long" sets can get predictable. Even for a band that prides itself on differing setlists.
Quote:
Originally Posted by CrushLive
Who's this BrahmaBull guy? I want to fight him.
|
Go back to the SPAC thread and start a fight.