Quote:
Originally Posted by zajDmB1
The problem with expecting 'real stakes' in a super hero movie is it doesn't fucking matter
If you're at all familiar with comics, people die/come back all the time. The universe has reset multiple times over the last few decades. As much as I love the Dark Knights, etc, we don't need to make every superhero movie this hyperrealistic, how would it happen in 'real life' thing. They're super heroes. Let them be super heroes.
|
I mean, I get it, at the end of the day we're talking about comic book movies. And stupid, crazy, unrealistic stuff happens in the books all the time.
But, if we're going under the assumption that we want actions to have consequences and for things within the story to make logical sense and follow basic tenets of storytelling, I think having "stakes" that matter is important, at least to the extent possible within the genre.
As far as the hyper-realistic thing goes, the Nolan films were like this but the DCEU largely has embraced the comic book elements. I think placing it within the "real world" or thinking about these stories as happening within our world makes for better storytelling. I thought the montage of the media debating the need for Superman was awesome and goes to the core of what makes superhero stories relevant after 80+ years of Superman's first appearance.
Quote:
Originally Posted by thebridge15
I actually don't really care about stakes in these movies that much either
like...I'm pretty anti "massive machine that can wipe out the planet for some reason" just because it's lazy storytelling, but for the "smaller" movies I'm ok if the bad guy doesn't seem THAT imposing
I thought guardians had a happy medium there. they were trying to stop one guy from destroying a big city, but the bad guy wasn't fearsome or anything, if anything you just thought he was a huge asshole
|
GOTG had one of the worst endings of all-time. Maybe the hardest I've ever rolled my eyes at a movie.