Quote:
Originally Posted by TMoore4075
Just cause it worked for the Kings doesn't mean it would work for the Flyers. I mean there are other guys too. Dustin Brown and Quick have been two of their MVP's and those guys wouldn't be on the Flyers.
It goes back to some Pens arguments about Hossa and he should have stayed and not gone to Detroit. Had he not gone to Detroit Guerin wouldn't have been traded for, Fedotenko wouldn't have signed there and even Satan who scored a goal in the playoffs. Plus with Hossa maybe the Pens are just good enough and MT doesn't get fired. Also had Hossa not gone to Detroit, Detroit might not get there either. He saved them during the season and while he didn't score many goals that playoff he scored some big ones.
|
I agree and disagree.
Agree to paragraph 2 about Hossa, not sure I agree about the Flyers deal. You can't tell me that Claude Giroux isn't capable of doing what Dustin Brown has done, and Bryz "should" be able to steal a couple games (maybe not like Quick has, but still he should be better than he was).
Simmonds was clearly a great pickup for them during the season, and had a career year, but 1 goal was not enough during the postseason (and that's a postseason where he was in a series that was just handing out goals to everyone that put their blades on the ice...I'm pretty sure Danny Markov was even credited with a goal...)
I don't know where I'm going with this, but I don't necessarily think it's something that can just be dismissed. It's worth debating and thinking about, as to where the Flyers would be if they kept Richards. I mean, say what you want about Mike, but the guy usually comes to play during the playoffs. He has two VERY good postseasons under his belt, and is in the process of a third.
Quote:
Originally Posted by JRS1386
Yea, you're an idiot (I kid, but really I hate you) I am not trying to saying that this justifies the season at all or helps explain why the Flyers are not in the playoffs anymore. See below for my explanation.
It worked for everyone but Columbus (man does that franchise suck). I am mainly talking about the media pundits down in Philadelphia. The last thing I want to hear are people questioning Holgrem's trades (question the Bryz signing if you need to bitch). I like the trades and think it was the right move for the team. It will be interesting to see how the young players do next year. Also, wonder how different that team would have been if Pronger didn't go down.
|
I think time will tell.
As I said in response to Tim, it's definitely worth thinking about. I don't think you can say one way or the other who "won" yet. But I mean, it'll be hard to say the Flyers weren't "losers" of the trades if the Kings manage to win the SCF with Mike Richards and Jeff Carter.
I mean, I know Schenn and Simmonds seemed to work out pretty damn well, and Voracek was a decent add on for you guys as well...but it's just hard not to look at that as a short term failure if the Kings could win with them but the Flyers couldn't.
Now, with Schenn still being so young, this deal obviously will need to withstand the test of time, and the Flyers had a good season overall considering they completely gutted the team, lost Pronger, etc. etc., but's it's just hard to ignore the Kings success right now.
Then again, they haven't won anything yet, so we'll see. I'm just thinking out loud right now.