Quote:
Originally Posted by JRS1386
So I going to be at a disadvantage here when I ask this because I don't care to watch a video where a man gets shot, but reading the description from the article it said that both angles showed it was clear that the guy had nothing in his right hand (his dominant hand). So I am confused as to where you are getting the "well shit... maybe next time BLM will get a win." attitude from
|
yeah, and it's pretty clear that was liberal (not political, "extremely generous", well, and political) authorship.
because you can clearly see his right pant leg rolled up to his knee and the holster on his ankle.
you can't tell if he's holding anything or not in either hand. that's not definitive or not. shame on the author for misleading.
but as a police officer, who is there, he saw a gun in his hand or he wouldn't have shot.
and of course... there's the gun on the ground when the suspect fell. (also viewed in other pics)
so... yeah. case closed. "well shit... maybe next time BLM will get a win" is completely justified. unlike their looting.
wait, when the fuck is looting every justified?