Is 8.4.92 a "fake" show comprised of 2 different sources??

[crkutney]

A while ago, I thought I saw in the "land of misfit shows" that 8.4.92 was a blend of two other dates. However, I don't see that on the current page over at ants. Does anyone know if 8.4.92 is indeed an actual show, labled correctly or is it an inaccurately dated mix of other recordings?

Chris
crkutney@wisc.edu

[Joe M.]

http://www.antsmarching.org/setlists...hp?ShowID=2828

[crkutney]

Website histories don't really hold much weight, though. For years nancies was the authority on setlist history, but even they have mistakes. Even dmb's official website had mistakes on their setlist history pages.

http://www.nancies.org/tour/reviews/020293.html

Thanks though.

Chris
crkutney@wisc.edu

[Joe M.]

Let me say this:

I would put a lot of things on the line over this setlist archive. There is SO much research behind this it's not funny.

[dmband_fan1]

Originally posted by Joe M.
Let me say this:

I would put a lot of things on the line over this setlist archive. There is SO much research behind this it's not funny.

yeah jake did his homework.

by the way dmb's site got its setlists from nancies

[crkutney]

Awesome, Joe. It's nice to hear that this team puts a lot of effort into the research. You've reassured me and definetly cemented my confidence in the system.

Chris
crkutney@wisc.edu

[scott brown]

>I would put a lot of things on the line over this setlist archive. There is SO much research behind this it's not funny. <<

i've found plenty of errors...

and i'm not trying to be an asshole in saying that, i'm just speaking the truth. no matter how much effort is put in, nothing is ever perfect.

[Joe M.]

Originally posted by scott brown
>I would put a lot of things on the line over this setlist archive. There is SO much research behind this it's not funny. <<

i've found plenty of errors...

and i'm not trying to be an asshole in saying that, i'm just speaking the truth. no matter how much effort is put in, nothing is ever perfect.

Plenty of errors?

Do you think there is a better archive?

EDIT: If there ever is an error its normally because it's from a show we had no previous record of and it was from setlists people gave that were at the concert. In any case if there ever is an error its always updated. Surely something can't ever be perfect. Wasn't really saying that. But it's definitly on the ball with accuracy.